EquipeLinux

Quintas Trabalhistas

2010-04-13T22:06:00.001-03:00

Assista ao Quintas na InterNet

Socialismo Democrático x Capitalismo Democrático x Capitalismo Ecológico

2010-03-14T17:11:00.003-03:00

Socialismo Democrático x Capitalismo Democrático x Capitalismo Ecológico

em http://www.democraciabrasileira.org/Blog/socialismo.html

Não existe socialismo sem capitalismo: Os regimes comunistas adotaram um sistema socialista no qual o capital é totalmente monopolizado pelo Estado, que no transcorrer do tempo só beneficia os membros do partido comunista e seus apaniguados.

O Comunismo é a superação do capitalismo E do socialismo, pela completa distribuição da produção entre os membros da sociedade.

Não existe poder político, já que a produção é administrada de modo centralizado e os produtos divididos entre os membros.

Os sistemas democráticos adotaram um sistema socialista no qual o capital é monopolizado pelo estado e pela iniciativa privada.

Não, no socialismo o capital não é monopolizado pelo Estado E pela iniciativa privada.

O monopólio é uma forma de ação sôbre o mercado, e no socialismo e no comunismo NÃO EXISTE MERCADO, pois o Estado intervém na economia IMPEDINDO a ação do mercado.

"Em economia, monopólio (do grego monos, um + polein, vender) é como se denomina uma situação de concorrência imperfeita, em que uma empresa detém o mercado de um determinado produto ou serviço, impondo preços aos que comercializam.

pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopólio: estrutura econômica controlada por uma só pessoa ou empresa; privilégio exclusivo para realizar um negócio ou prestar um serviço.

Forma de organização do mercado em que uma empresa domina a oferta de um determinado produto ou serviço que não pode ser substituído. A legislação da maioria dos países proíbe o monopólio, com exceção dos exercidos pelo Estado, geralmente em produtos e serviços estratégicos. www.lustosa.net/mercado/glossario.php"

Logo, tanto nos regimes comunista, ditatorial, quanto no regime democrático, o capital está presente.

Não, o capital não está presente, o que existe é um sistema econômico baseado em trocas, em que o produto é distribuído entre a população de acôrdo com a vontade do Comitê Central do Partido Comunista, ou de um grupo de capitalistas estatistas associados ao govêrno, em uma sociedade socialista.

Ou, melhor dizendo, o capital está presente, totalmente internalizado no Estado, que é o único capitalista.

A natureza humana é por essência, dinâmica, coletiva, colaboradora, fraterna, familiar, sociável, então, temos o dever de aplicar um socialismo extraído e fundamentado nos princípios dessa natureza , da necessidade do momento, da cultura e costume do povo.

Êste discurso da natureza humana é quase religioso.

A natureza humana não é a mesma, no mesmo ser humano, à medida em que êle envelhece.

O conhecimento que adquire durante a vida o capacita a fazer mais do que a "natureza dinâmica, coletiva, colaboradora, fraterna, familiar, sociável" de quando é criança.

À medida em que envelhece e aprende o ser humano muda sua natureza para uma versão mais acabada, mais consentânea com posição do ser humano na cadeia trófica.

É a educação e a cultura que distingue o ser humano dos demais animais do Planêta, e não sua "natureza religiosa", o que, a religião, é, finalmente, também cultural.

Embora os aborígenes tenham cultos, não são cultos para êles, são cultos dêles, para nós.

É IMPOSSÍVEL extrair um socialismo do individualismo, isto é um silogismo.

Ao dizer que a NATUREZA HUMANA é sociável, você diz que é uma natureza INDIVIDUAL, pois não seria possível existir um GRUPO (coletivo, família, sociável) sem a existência do INDIVÍDUO.

Assim, o INDIVÍDUO é a ÚNICA entidade reconhecida pela natureza, e a AÇÃO DO INDIVÍDUO é social, familiar, política, e é por isto que UM INDIVÍDUO está fundando o PSDD, e não um coletivo.

Logo, não existe o socialismo democrático, pois a democracia não é uma ideologia, é um sistema de tomada de decisões políticas e administrativas, fundada, no nascedouro, na ESCRAVIDÃO.

Em Atenas, quando a população era de 300.000 habitantes, 40.000 eram gregos e o resto eram escravos.

A democracia direta só era possível porque os escravos estavam disponíveis para levarem a cabo as decisões dos cidadãos, que as tomavam em amplas praças, que existiam justamente para os gregos (nativos, não escravos, homens livres) se reunirem e decidirem sôbre os destinos da comunidade.

NÃO EXISTE DEMOCRACIA SEM ESCRAVIDÃO.

O que você está tentando caracterizar é a DEMARQUIA, que foi definida e proposta por Henry Maksoud, nas décadas de 80 - 90, se não me falha a memória.

"Democracia vem da palavra grega “demos” que significa povo. Nas democracias, é o povo quem detém o poder soberano sobre o poder legislativo e o executivo.

Embora existam pequenas diferenças nas várias democracias, certos princípios e práticas distinguem o governo democrático de outras formas de governo.

Democracia é o governo no qual o poder e a responsabilidade cívica são exercidos por todos os cidadãos, diretamente ou através dos seus representantes livremente eleitos.

Democracia é um conjunto de princípios e práticas que protegem a liberdade humana; é a institucionalização da liberdade.

A democracia baseia-se nos princípios do governo da maioria associados aos direitos individuais e das minorias.

Todas as democracias, embora respeitem a vontade da maioria, protegem escrupulosamente os direitos fundamentais dos indivíduos e das minorias.

As democracias protegem de governos centrais muito poderosos e fazem a descentralização do governo a nível regional e local, entendendo que o governo local deve ser tão acessível e receptivo às pessoas quanto possível.

As democracias entendem que uma das suas principais funções é proteger direitos humanos fundamentais como a liberdade de expressão e de religião; o direito a proteção legal igual; e a oportunidade de organizar e participar plenamente na vida política, econômica e cultural da sociedade.

As democracias conduzem regularmente eleições livres e justas, abertas a todos os cidadãos. As eleições numa democracia não podem ser fachadas atrás das quais se escondem ditadores ou um partido único, mas verdadeiras competições pelo apoio do povo.

A democracia sujeita os governos ao Estado de Direito e assegura que todos os cidadãos recebam a mesma proteção legal e que os seus direitos sejam protegidos pelo sistema judiciário.

As democracias são diversificadas, refletindo a vida política, social e cultural de cada país. As democracias baseiam-se em princípios fundamentais e não em práticas uniformes.

Os cidadãos numa democracia não têm apenas direitos, têm o dever de participar no sistema político que, por seu lado, protege os seus direitos e as suas liberdades.

As sociedades democráticas estão empenhadas nos valores da tolerância, da cooperação e do compromisso. As democracias reconhecem que chegar a um consenso requer compromisso e que isto nem sempre é realizável.

Nas palavras de Mahatma Gandhi, “a intolerância é em si uma forma de violência e um obstáculo ao desenvolvimento do verdadeiro espírito democrático”." (http://www.embaixada-americana.org.br/democracia/what.htm)

Como você pode ver, a DEMOCRACIA é BASEADA NO INDIVÍDUO, e não no COLETIVO, logo, É IMPOSSÍVEL EXISTIR UM SOCIALISMO DEMOCRÁTICO, é um equivalente à incosistência dimensional, na física e na matemática.

Este socialismo é extraído da essência da natureza humana e fundamentado nos princípios norteadores da vida em sociedade, como princípios do humanismo, isonomia interesse, liberdade, dignidade, individualidade, sociabilidade e outros. Este é o socialismo democrático que será o estimulador da evolução, conduzindo a sociedade a melhor qualidade de vida.

Você citou características do INDIVÍDUO HUMANO, não do coletivo humano, logo, é IMPOSSÍVEL EXISTIR UM SOCIALISMO DEMOCRÁTICO,

Socialismo democrático é a filosofia socialista que respeita o direito de propriedade, lucro,

Se há lucro, não há socialismo, se há propriedade, não há socialismo.

Leia o que Marx e Engels publicaram na Gazeta da Renânia em abril de 1849 sôbre como o comunismo seria implantado no Mundo e o que deveria ser feito com os povos atrasados (de acôrdo com a definição de atrasado de Marx e Engels) e você verá qual a gênese do sistema que você está querendo mascarar com democracia.

investimento e exploração econômica. Na qual não haverá limites para as riquezas individuais e coletivas, mas estas terão que atender às funções sociais.

Esta é a maior MENTIRA histórica do socialismo. Se existe uma "função social" da propriedade, e você diz que o lucro e a propriedade privada existem no "seu" sistema socialista democrático, então porque os proprietários não se reunem e decidem SOZINHOS como e qual será a função social da propriedade, pois SOMENTE os proprietários, por serem os proprietários, é que SABEM COMO FAZER A FUNÇÃO DA PROPRIEDADE, POIS SOMENTE ÊLES TÊM A PROPRIEDADE?

Como não serão os proprietários quem decidirá sôbre a função social da propriedade, mas justamente aquêles que NÃO TÊM propriedade, e por isto mesmo não SABEM nada sôbre a propriedade, então NÃO HAVERÁ SOCIALISMO DEMOCRÁTICO, pois os "eleitores" da propriedade NÃO VÃO VOTAR.

É roubo de propriedade privada em nome da justiça social, que não existe, porque, como o seu "socialismo democrático", é uma INVENÇÃO que só existe na cabeça de quem inventou.

Ele prioriza a função social da riqueza, mas não castra o potencial de cada ser humano de conquistá-la, nos ditames da aptidão dos dons naturais e do respeito à ordem social.

Se a ordem social não é estipulada pelos proprietários, então não é ordem, é ditadura.

Os trabalhadores deveriam estipular sôbre o que os trabalhadores fazem e os proprietários sôbre as propriedades e os profissionais liberais sôbre as atividades profissionais, isto seria DEMOCRÁTICO, isto é, cada um de acôrdo com "os ditames da aptidão dos dons naturais".

Proponho a estrutura de um novo sistema político, que é a democracia direta.

Logo, um democracia direta é impossível porque os que vão votar não são AS MESMAS PESSOAS, logo, não serão os MESMOS VOTOS.

O que você está propondo é uma OCLOCRACIA, em que um medíocre é eleito por outros medíocres para governar, porque todos sabem, por medíocres, que não haverá NUNCA uma meritocracia para atrapalhar os planos da mediocridade coletiva.

Veja, a excelência não é coletiva, é INDIVIDUAL, a mediocridade é COLETIVA.

Este tem capacidade para desenvolver o socialismo democrático que não fere os princípios norteadores da vida humana. O maior princípio desse socialismo é o democrático;

Aqui você está dizendo que o que você disse está certo, é como citar a si mesmo para justificar algo que você diz.

nele, a sociedade regulamenta sua própria convivência, respeitando a consciência coletiva social e cultural. E a democracia direta é o único sistema no qual o povo não perde o poder do voto.

Não existe uma democracia direta porque, justamente, não há o que votar numa democracia direta, pois o mérito do que será votado já seria de conhecimento de todos, tornando desnecessário votar por algo que todos já sabem que é correto.

Justamente porque não é possível todos saberem o que é certo, mas cada indivíduo tem uma noção do que é certo, ligeiramente diferente do que outro afirma - embora concordando - é que a democracia direta não pode ser praticada.

O poder capaz de dar ao povo a liberdade de auto-regulamentação da convivência social.

A auto-regulamentação é uma regulamentação baseada no MÉRITO, e a OCLOCRACIA é baseada na FALTA do Mérito.

O termo democracia na sua origem grega expressava uma liberdade parcial do povo,

Não, não era, era TOTAL, e DEPENDIA de escravos para ser tornada realidade. Os Gregos reuniam-se nas praças para deliberar e os Metecos tornava as decisões realidade usando a mão-de-obra escrava para construir o que foi decidido.

hoje na sociedade moderna este termo expressa a liberdade total do ser humano,

A LIBERDADE TOTAL É UMA GRANDE MENTIRA, pois não é possível algo ser TOTAL PARA TODOS.

porém como respeito ao nossos semelhante e a ordem social. Mas, essa virtude da palavra democracia não está implícita no nosso meio social, porque os partidos políticos ficaram desatualizados e não são mais condizentes com a sociedade moderna.

Ao contrário, a sociedade moderna é EXATAMENTE isto que os partidos políticos REPRESENTAM, porque, justamente os partidos políticos REPRESENTAM: é o que há no Povo para ser representado.

Assim junto ao povo,

NÃO FOI JUNTO AO POVO, você fêz isto sozinho.

É como a proclamação da República no Brasil, feita por meia dúzia de alienados e um General Imperialista enganado e que não cumpriu o Decreto da República N. 1.

formaremos o PARTIDO SOCIALISTA DA DEMOCRACIA DIRETA (PSDD), que terá, na sua essência, a verdadeira filosofia do socialismo democrático. O conceito desta sigla expressa o sentido do termo democracia, que é muito extenso. Assim como nele está implícita a natureza dos princípios norteadores da vida humana em sociedade, como liberdade, igualdade, dignidade, interesse e outros.

Diante da nova visão do termo democracia,

O têrmo democracia não pode ter uma nova definição, você é que não tem criatividade para inventar algo nôvo e está se apropriando (a sua propriedade privada) do têrmo para fazer o que já está pronto.

este passa a ser considerado como o princípio democrático que abriga todos os outros princípios necessários para regulamentar a convivência da vida humana em sociedade, na sua diversidade de culturas e etnias. Assim, teremos estrutura política autêntica para criarmos mecanismos que direcionem a humanidade no caminho da prosperidade, mas nos parâmetros da sua própria natureza.

Portanto, somente o termo democracia associado ao socialismo democrático é suficiente para que as organizações políticas autênticas expressem todas as virtudes de regime político estruturado no princípio democrático coerente com a natureza do povo.

Outra mentira histórica, pois não há democracia com socialismo.

Então, fundamentado nestes conceitos, estamos constituindo o Partido Socialista da Democracia Direta (PSDD). Assim, implantaremos o novo regime político para o povo brasileiro, que é a democracia direta com legislativo especializado.

O Liegislativo já é especializado, pois só faz uma coisa: legisla.

O que você quer é que o legislador tenha diploma de nível superior e seja capacitado, profissionalmente, para legislar.

É só investir na EDUCAÇÃO DO POVO que o Povo vota melhor.

Com este criaremos mecanismo para resgataremos as famílias vítimas do caos social e transformaremos a nossa pátria, que hoje é uma fábrica de mendigos, em uma indústria de cidadãs e cidadãos idôneos.

Isto só a EDUCAÇÃO faz, e no socialismo não existe educação para o Povo, pois no momento que uma pessoa entende que está sendo enganada por outro, pára de segui-lo.

Mas se você quer mesmo entender como funciona um indivíduo, sugiro uma visita a:

http://www.objectivistcenter.org/ct-1670-AynRand.aspx.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ukJiBZ8_4k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzGFytGBDN8

http://www.aynrandsociety.org/

http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=index&cvridirect=true

http://mises.org/

http://www.mises.org.br/

IMPOSTOS

2010-02-25T16:07:00.000-03:00

Uma forma de baixar os impostos, enquanto as muitas outras ações governamentais seriam implementadas, é a desoneração dos impostos de impostos. Tudo o que o .gov gasta É impôsto.

Assim, ao contratar uma obra a uma, ou mais empresa privada, toda a parcela de orçamento público destinado ao custeio daquela obra deve ser ISENTA de TODOS os impostos, devendo-se levar a isenção à tôda a cadeia produtiva e de pessoal da empresa envolvida na obra contratada ao orçamento. Do recurso auferido pelo serviço, a empresa e seus empregados somente irão pagar impôsto sôbre êste recurso quando o dinheiro trocar de titularidade, isto é, deixar de ser público para ser privado, por exemplo, quando um empregado comprar pão, carro, remédio, produtos que têm impôsto de valor adicionado.

Sôbre o recurso recebido do orçamento e sua imediata transferência aos empregados e fornecedores, não deveria haver impôsto a ser cobrado, pois o dinheiro em questão É impôsto, e não faz sentido cobrar impôsto de impôsto.

Se o .gov cobra 10% de impôsto sôbre um recurso orçamentário investido em serviços ou produtos, então serão necessários 120% para repor o poder de compra dos 100% que sofreram a taxação, calculando a grosso modo, para simplificar a questão. As demais taxas e impostos poderiam ser reduzidos para 0,1% em suas alíquotas, de modo a baixar a carga tributária sem ser preciso fazer uma reforma tributária.

Todo salário pagaria 7% de impôsto: 2% para o município, 2% para o Estado, 2% para a União e 1% para um fundo de emergência a ser aplicado no município e administrado pela União.

CONSOLIDAÇÃO DAS PROFISSÕES LIBERAIS - A PESSOA LIBERAL

Um Profissional Liberal (http://ProfissionalLiberal.ning.com) pagaria a mesma taxa sôbre o faturamento e nenhum outro impôsto, pois a capacidade de gerar emprêgos que um Profissional Liberal tem poderia ser ampliada.

Um engenheiro poderia contratar uma Personal Assitant (ou um equivalente .br), um administrador para seu escritório, os advogados poderiam ampliar o quadro de pessoal de seu escritório, pois os impostos seriam diminuídos em relação à situação anterior. Um Profissional Liberal poderia ser uma Pessoa Liberal, sem haver a necessidade de constituir uma Pessoa Jurídica para exercer sua profissão (http://EquipeLinux.BlogSpot.com).

PLANO DE CAMPANHA

Creio que esta intervenção já e um prenúncio que devemos arquitetar um Plano de Campanha genérico, com idéias básicas e princípios norteadores da adminstração de uma Prefeitura de pequeno porte. Vamos adotar quatro idéias básicas para iniciar o debate:

Primeiro, estancar a tendência de crescimento e diminuir a máquina governamental.

Em face do nôvo govêrno (assumindo que ganhei a eleição Presidencial) dever ocupar os cargos existentes aí - que é para onde vai o dinheiro (follow the money), e que se não ocupar não vai ocupar a capilaridade criada pela gastança e não vai saber quem, como, com quem, para quem e para quê o dinheiro do orçamento é gasto, eu nomearia os mesmos cargos com liberais ou pró-liberais.

No primeiro ano de administração o nôvo govêrno teria de conhecer a estrutura federal existente, promover sua eficácia (o mais possível - isto é, fazer funcionar o que quer que esteja lá) e preparar o PPA e a Lei de Diretrizes Orçamentárias para o ano seguinte.

Agora é que o "bicho pega": você desmonta o govêrno no segundo ano de administração ou usa a estrutura para fomentar os mercados que você SABE que são necessários, não estão lá fora e não tem (quase) ninguém para criar?

"Segundo, diminuir a carga tributária

Repondida acima.

Terceiro, remodelar a estrutura do sistema previdenciário

O Sistema Previdenciário poderia ser uma Agência Privada?
Em que moldes?
Como fomentar a criação de um mercado de assistência social e previdenciária?
Como propor um Plano de Ação para os empreendedores comprarem a idéia que o .gov não vai intervir e aceitar que deve haver um mínimo de regulação para dar garantias aos direitos das pessoas?

Como implementar esta regulação?

Quarto, Reestruturar o modelo político atual

A chamada Reforma Política é um mastro que você agita com a bandeira.
Vai bater em você.
Se é para reformar o sistema político sou a favor da inegibilidade de todos os políticos da legislatura anterior à Reforma, isto é, eleger 100% novos representantes para elaborar e votar a Reforma Política. Mas isto equivale à uma Constituinte, só que apenas para um aspecto da institucionalidade - pouco prático.

Deve haver um meio de fazermos uma Reforma Política SEM a participação dos atuais ocupantes dos cargos eletivos, afinal, se vamos mudar, não é com êstes que estão aí.

Quinto, reconceituar o poder legislativo

Sugiro a criação de um nôvo Poder Judiciário, a partir do zero, com a eleição dos Juízes, de uma forma apartidária (o mais possível) e a extinção do Poder Judiciário atual, que permaneceria funcional com os processos existentes até a extinção de todos, quando todos os cargos seriam extintos e os funcionários permaneceriam na fôlha até a aposentadoria, ou poderiam ser aproveitados no nôvo Judiciário.

REFORMA AGRÁRIA E URBANA

Quanto às regiões mais pobres do .br, com cidades funcionalmente equivalentes a estrebarias de eleitores ("ESTREBARIAS DE ENSINO - Os antigos egípcios, que criaram as primeiras escolas, chamavam-na de estribarias de ensino. Os professores, de instrutores das estrebarias educacionais. Escreviam sentenças, como “Os ouvidos dos estudantes estão colocados em suas costas.

Se quer que o ensino lhe entre pelos ouvidos, batei-lhes nas costas. - http://serenao.wordpress.com/"), poder-se-ia regular a definição de cidade: cidade é o lugar onde não há criança ou velho desassistido e que paga tôdas as contas da administração pública, e com isto, evitar a necessidade de repasse. As "cidades" que não pudessem ser cidades poderiam receber ajuda federal via investimento em criação de mercados para empresas de segurança, fábrica de armas para as fôrças armadas. Deve haver um a maneira de promover a ocupação dêstes territórios de modo a induzir algum uso local produtivo. A construção de pequenas vilas com superadobe permitiria acesso à habitação digna, barata (e que poderia ser financiada por impostos federais), auto-suficiência alimentar - construção de cisternas para reserva de água e para tanques de criação de peixes.

Em http://www.grupos.com.br/group/retrans/Messages.html?action=message... você tem uma idéia de como seria perfeitamente possível fazer isto. Com estas medidas, dentre outras, poderiamos substituir a demanda por uma reforma agrária pela oferta de mercados de produção alimentar e de construção civil para ocupar os grotões do .br, com assistência técnica e universitária promovidas pelo Projeto Rondon Ampliado.

INVESTIMENTO EM PESSOAL DAS CIDADES MENORES

No campo da educação, uma releitura do Projeto Rondon, com alunos de útimo ano de faculdades e de escolas técnicas poderiam ser atribuídos a estas cidades, com projetos de infra-estrutura administrados pelas Universidades participantes, bem como pelas escolas técnicas.

Um Programa Federal de Estágio para formandos. Após a conclusão do curso - técnico un universitário - cada estudante pode escolher se faz um estágio na iniciativa privada - e terá sua regulamentação - ou se participa do Projeto Rondon Ampliado.

Uma equipe de universitários e técnicos é atribuído para uma cidade dêste tipo e ocupa as funções de conselheiro aos cargos do poder executivo local - secretários de obras, saneamento, etc.

O estágio duraria 6 meses para os universitários e um ano para os técnicos, assim, as cidades teriam apoio federal para receber pessoal técnico capacitado e as obras indicadas poderiam ser pagas pela União e pelos Estados e os profissionais assim formados teriam a certificação Federal correspondente pelos serviços prestados à nação.

Como o Govêrno se financia?

O Governo se financia de 3 formas:

1-tributária: através de impostos;
2-financeiro: fazendo dívidas; e
3-através da senhoriagem: emitindo moeda.

O sistema financeiro se baseia na criação de dívida geral baseada na emissão de moeda contra uma garantia que não existe e que se resume à capacidade da população de trabalhar para pagar esta dívida que "ela contraiu" quando o .gov emitiu a moeda. É um sistema fracionário baseado em um Banco Central que administra a dívida geral. É, na verdade, uma agressão (de natureza finaceira) à população, que não tem como se defender.

Talvez criando um Sistema Financeiro baseado em produtos poderíamos contrabalançar a geração da dívida geral que a sociedade tem de pagar com uma produção autônoma e sustentável. Esta proposta abraça a necessidade da reforma agrária, que não será mais necessária. O financiamento, com recursos públicos, de uma economia baseada em produtos, nas áreas mais pobres, diminuiria o volume de recursos com subsídios e fomentaria uma produção autônoma e sustentável com base na capacidade de criar uma economia de subsistência.

Como podemos ver, nosso debate parte para os "finarmente", com propostas que poderiam (e deveriam) ser detalhadas, o que acaba por se constituir em um Plano de Campanha e um Plano de Govêrno. Um dia, teremos de para de falar para começar a fazer. É bom a gente ter um Plano para isto. Visite o Grupo Prefeitura Libertária e contribua.

Em http://ProfissionalLiberal.ning.com/ estamos construindo uma nova Pessoa, a pessoa Liberal e promovendo a Consolidação das Leis das Profissões Liberais em um único código.

Regulamentação das Profissões de Informática

2009-12-08T15:13:00.007-02:00

Regulamentação ou Conselho Federal Profissional?

O Projeto da SBC, de regulamentação das profissões de informática, diz: "O requisito fundamental para regulamentar este mandamento constitucional para profissões específicas apóia-se na possibilidade de o exercício de uma determinada profissão poder causar sério dano social, principalmente relativo à exposição de vidas humanas a riscos."

As profissões de TI PODEM causar sérios danos às pessoas: você dirige um carro que “fala” com você? E se o programa entrar em curto por existir um campo magnético muito forte, um disco rígido bater uma cabeça de leitura numa trilha de programa, o que você pensa que vai acontecer?

Não existe um sistema de contrôle de qualidade para programas de computador no mesmo nível praticado pela inústria automobilística, por exemplo, em que os componentes de um veículo são extensivamente testados antes de serem introduzidos em um veículo e pôsto à venda ao público.

E se o programa que controla a dosagem de componentes em drogas medicinais falhasse, o que você pensa que aconteceria?

A produção de programas de computador É tão séria quando a construção civil ou a Medicina.

Você já leu o Têrmo de Licença de Uso Programa de Computador da empresa das janelinhas? Você não TEM DIREITO NENHUM (bem, você tem o direito de usar), só tem OBRIGAÇÕES e não pode reinvindicar nada.

E você NÃO TEM GARANTIA NENHUMA E SEGURANÇA NENHUMA, tudo fica por sua conta e risco.

Isto ocorre por decorrência da natureza física (magnética) do meio utilizado para o transporte e uso final do programa de computador.

Você gostaria de estar em um avião quando o comandante avisasse que o sistema travou e o avião TERIA de cair para reinicializar o sistema?

Pergunte à Marinha dos EUA o que acontece quando as janelinhas travam e os navios ficam à mercê de atacantes, que por sorte, nunca estão por perto quando o navio fica completamente morto por divisão por zero, por exemplo.
Pergunte a uma empresa de seguros se êles concordam em SEGURAR o sistema que você usa.

Novamente citando o projeto da SBC: “Nestes casos, para a devida defesa da Sociedade, impõe-se o cumprimento de cursos específicos, obtenção de diplomas de cursos superiores e submissão dos profissionais às regras de órgãos fiscalizadores.
É aqui que a tendência corporativista da elite acadêmica e comercial brasileiras entra em cena.

TODOS pensam em ESTADO quando uma RESPONSABILIDADE deve ser assumida. Todos concordam em assinar a Declaração Universal dos Direitos do Homem e TODOS fogem, como o diabo foge da cruz, de assinar uma Declaração Universal das Responsabilidades Humanas, que é o que todos temos, para conosco, com nossos semelhantes e TÔDA a forma de vida da Terra.

Realmente, somente a qualidade da formação escolar ou acadêmica poderá oferecer uma “garantia” da qualidade do trabalho de um Profissional Liberal formado em TI.

Agora sim, a experiência britânica poderá ser útil em estabelecer, aqui, um conjunto de idéias de institucionalização das Profissões de TI, auto-regulando a ação dos profissionais.

As idéias Inglêsas de TI como uma profissão focada em negócios e com objetivo de maximizar a exploração das tecnologias de informação pode ser uma chamada à realidade para nós.

Não que seja da SBC esta obrigação, pois a SBC pode ser uma organização com um objetivo e existirem outras organizações com tais objetivos.
Lembremo-nos. sempre, de perguntar-nos o que cada um de nós pode fazer pelas profissões de Tecnologias de Informação, antes de perguntar o que a SBC pode fazer por nós.

É nossa responsabilidade criar as organizações civis profissionais, tal como, uma .org.br para Análise, outra para banco de dados, de acôrdo com as identidades e preferências dos profissionais.

Por outro lado, não havendo riscos para a Sociedade, ou existindo outros mecanismos mais eficazes para sua proteção,

Há muitos anos que clamo no deserto pelo fim dos Conselhos Federais Profissionais e que o Ministério Público deve assumir TÔDAS as funções FISCALIZADORAS da Profissões Liberais, a Receita Federal deve assumir a cobrança das taxas e impostos relativos ao exercício das Profissões Liberais e o Ministério do Trabalho, por meio das Delegacias Regionais do Trabalho devem assumir a responsabilidade de fazer e certificar os registros do exercício das Profissões Liberais.

Um Profissional Liberal é diferente de uma Pessoa Física ou uma Pessoa Jurídica: é uma Pessoa Liberal.

Os impostos para os Profissionais Liberais deveriam ser diferentes, pois a capacidade de criar emprêgos é diferente.

Não deveria haver a exigência de uma CNPJ ou sede física para o exercício de uma Profissão Liberal, pois, geralmente, quando um PL é contratado, pode exercer sua atividade tanto nas dependências do cliente quanto em suas próprias.

A Lei deveria PROIBIR a contratação de um Profissional Liberal como EMPREGADO, pois o exercício de uma atividade liberal é completamente incompatível com a dependência e a submissão a um patrão: um PL não tem patrão.

Na matemática isto equivaleria à uma inconsistência dimensional.

Novamente recorrendo ao texto da proposta da SBC, cita-se:

"como ocorre na Informática, recomenda-se, em nome do interesse social, da eficiência e da qualidade de bens e serviços oferecidos à população, a prevalência da liberdade sobre o anti-democrático cerceamento do direito ao exercício profissional, tradicionalmente imposto por conselhos de profissão."

Também concordamos com isto.

Não há provas de haver democracia com um Conselho Federal Profissional e de NÃO HAVER DEMOCRACIA sem o Conselho Federal Profissional.

O Brasil é um País de Todos, a InterNet não.

2009-09-15T17:42:00.008-03:00

Para garantirmos a liberdade de expressão na InterNet precisamos pressionar o Legislativo para preservar nossas Liberdades, e não suprimi-las.
Envie a carta abaixo para a lista no fim da carta.

Exmo. Sr(a) Deputado(a) Federal(a),

Como Cidadão, Eleitor e Internauta, expresso minha vontade de ver a minha liberdade de expressão defendida nesta casa, nos Têrmos da Constituição Federal de 1988, no Art. , verbis:

"TÍTULO I

Dos Princípios Fundamentais

Art. 1º A República Federativa do Brasil, formada pela união indissolúvel dos Estados e Municípios e do Distrito Federal, constitui-se em Estado Democrático de Direito e tem como fundamentos:
I - a soberania;
II - a cidadania
III - a dignidade da pessoa humana;
IV - os valores sociais do trabalho e da livre iniciativa;
V - o pluralismo político.

Art. 3º Constituem objetivos fundamentais da República Federativa do Brasil:
I - construir uma sociedade livre, justa e solidária;
II - garantir o desenvolvimento nacional;
III - erradicar a pobreza e a marginalização e reduzir as desigualdades sociais e regionais;
IV - promover o bem de todos, sem preconceitos de origem, raça, sexo, cor, idade e quaisquer outras formas de discriminação.

Art. 4º A República Federativa do Brasil rege-se nas suas relações internacionais pelos seguintes princípios:
I - independência nacional;
II - prevalência dos direitos humanos;
III - autodeterminação dos povos;
IV - não-intervenção;
V - igualdade entre os Estados;
VI - defesa da paz;
VII - solução pacífica dos conflitos;
VIII - repúdio ao terrorismo e ao racismo;
IX - cooperação entre os povos para o progresso da humanidade;
X - concessão de asilo político.

TÍTULO II
Dos Direitos e Garantias Fundamentais

CAPÍTULO I
DOS DIREITOS E DEVERES INDIVIDUAIS E COLETIVOS

Art. 5º Todos são iguais perante a lei, sem distinção de qualquer natureza, garantindo-se aos brasileiros e aos estrangeiros residentes no País a inviolabilidade do direito à vida, à liberdade, à igualdade, à segurança e à propriedade, nos termos seguintes:
I - homens e mulheres são iguais em direitos e obrigações, nos termos desta Constituição;
II - ninguém será obrigado a fazer ou deixar de fazer alguma coisa senão em virtude de lei;
III - ninguém será submetido a tortura nem a tratamento desumano ou degradante;
IV - é livre a manifestação do pensamento, sendo vedado o anonimato;
V - é assegurado o direito de resposta, proporcional ao agravo, além da indenização por dano material, moral ou à imagem;
VI - é inviolável a liberdade de consciência e de crença, sendo assegurado o livre exercício dos cultos religiosos e garantida, na forma da lei, a proteção aos locais de culto e a suas liturgias;

...

IX - é livre a expressão da atividade intelectual, artística, científica e de comunicação, independentemente de censura ou licença;

Somente por esta alínea, Sr(as) Deputados(ras), Vs. Exas. já cometem CRIME DE LESA MAJESTADE ao violarem, frontalmente, a Constituição Federal.

...
XII - é inviolável o sigilo da correspondência e das comunicações telegráficas, de dados e das comunicações telefônicas, salvo, no último caso, por ordem judicial, nas hipóteses e na forma que a lei estabelecer para fins de investigação criminal ou instrução processual penal;
XIII - é livre o exercício de qualquer trabalho, ofício ou profissão, atendidas as qualificações profissionais que a lei estabelecer;

Nós, usuários dos protocolos de comunicação que constituem a InterNet ( a rede das redes), exatamente da mesma maneria que V. Exa., seus familiares, filhos e netos e descendentes, desejamos que a tecnologia seja uma ferramenta auxiliar para cumprir e fazer cumprir os princípios constitucionais vigentes, preservando o capitalismo e a garantia da propriedade privada como meios para atingir aos Objetivos Nacionais Permanentes de superação da miséria e da probreza, das desigualdades regionais e direitos de livre expressão, sem constrangimento ao meio e á mídia utilizados e do pluralismo político, para o quê é inescapável o uso das ferramentas de comunicação global, pois não haverá pluralismo político sem a completa liberdade de expressão.

Se a oposição à liberdade de expressão eletrônica manifestada por Vs. Exas. fôsse assumida com relação à introdução da máquina a vapor, até hoje andaríamos a cavalo: imagine a Av. Paulista com cavalos amarrados em frente aos prédios.
Aliás, não haveria a Av. Paulista, pois sem a máquina à vapor a construção civil jamais teria se desenvolvido.

Encarecidamente solicitamos a Vs. Exas. a reconsideração em sua posição frente a um ato que só faz paralelo ao nacional-socialismo de Adolph Hitler e da queima de livros pelos Nazistas.

Não queime nossos bytes, senhor(a) Deputado(a).

São seus também.

Não atrase o País inteiro por uma razão equivocada sôbre o que é uma tecnologia e como auferir de seus benefícios sem violar o direito alheio, isto poderia ser equivalente a somente aplicar uma vacina aos correligionários.

Atenciosamente

Um seu eleitor(a)

Eis a Lista dos Deputados Federais:

"Correio Eletrônico"
"dep.abelardocamarinha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.abelardolupion@camara.gov.br"
"dep.aceliocasagrande@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ademircamilo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.aeltonfreitas@camara.gov.br"
"dep.affonsocamargo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.afonsohamm@camara.gov.br"
"dep.airtonroveda@camara.gov.br"
"dep.albanofranco@camara.gov.br"
"dep.albericofilho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.albertosilva@camara.gov.br"
"dep.alceniguerra@camara.gov.br"
"dep.aldorebelo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.alexcanziani@camara.gov.br"
"dep.alexandresantos@camara.gov.br"
"dep.alexandresilveira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.alfredokaefer@camara.gov.br"
"dep.aliceportugal@camara.gov.br"
"dep.alinecorrea@camara.gov.br"
"dep.anaarraes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.andredepaula@camara.gov.br"
"dep.andrevargas@camara.gov.br"
"dep.andrezacharow@camara.gov.br"
"dep.andreiazito@camara.gov.br"
"dep.angelaamin@camara.gov.br"
"dep.angelaportela@camara.gov.br"
"dep.angelovanhoni@camara.gov.br"
"dep.anibalgomes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.anselmodejesus@camara.gov.br"
"dep.antonioandrade@camara.gov.br"
"dep.antoniobulhoes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.antoniocarlosbiffi@camara.gov.br"
"dep.antoniocarlosbiscaia@camara.gov.br"
"dep.antoniocarloschamariz@camara.gov.br"
"dep.antoniocarlosmagalhaesneto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.antoniocarlosmendesthame@camara.gov.br"
"dep.antoniocarlospannunzio@camara.gov.br"
"dep.antoniocruz@camara.gov.br"
"dep.antoniofeijao@camara.gov.br"
"dep.antoniopalocci@camara.gov.br"
"dep.antonioroberto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.aracelydepaula@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ariostoholanda@camara.gov.br"
"dep.arlindochinaglia@camara.gov.br"
"dep.armandoabilio@camara.gov.br"
"dep.armandomonteiro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.arnaldofariadesa@camara.gov.br"
"dep.arnaldojardim@camara.gov.br"
"dep.arnaldomadeira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.arnaldovianna@camara.gov.br"
"dep.arnonbezerra@camara.gov.br"
"dep.aroldedeoliveira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.asdrubalbentes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.assisdocouto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.atilalins@camara.gov.br"
"dep.atilalira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.augustofarias@camara.gov.br"
"dep.belmesquita@camara.gov.br"
"dep.beneditodelira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.bernardoariston@camara.gov.br"
"dep.betinhorosado@camara.gov.br"
"dep.betoalbuquerque@camara.gov.br"
"dep.betofaro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.betomansur@camara.gov.br"
"dep.bilacpinto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.bispogetenuta@camara.gov.br"
"dep.bonifaciodeandrada@camara.gov.br"
"dep.brizolaneto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.brunoaraujo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.brunorodrigues@camara.gov.br"
"dep.camilocola@camara.gov.br"
"dep.candidovaccarezza@camara.gov.br"
"dep.capitaoassumcao@camara.gov.br"
"dep.carlosabicalil@camara.gov.br"
"dep.carlosalbertocanuto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.carlosalbertolereia@camara.gov.br"
"dep.carlosbezerra@camara.gov.br"
"dep.carlosbrandao@camara.gov.br"
"dep.carloseduardocadoca@camara.gov.br"
"dep.carlosmelles@camara.gov.br"
"dep.carlossampaio@camara.gov.br"
"dep.carlossantana@camara.gov.br"
"dep.carloswillian@camara.gov.br"
"dep.carloszarattini@camara.gov.br"
"dep.celsomaldaner@camara.gov.br"
"dep.celsorussomanno@camara.gov.br"
"dep.cezarsilvestri@camara.gov.br"
"dep.charleslucena@camara.gov.br"
"dep.chicoabreu@camara.gov.br"
"dep.chicoalencar@camara.gov.br"
"dep.chicodangelo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.chicodaprincesa@camara.gov.br"
"dep.chicolopes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.cidadiogo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.cirogomes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.cironogueira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ciropedrosa@camara.gov.br"
"dep.claudiocajado@camara.gov.br"
"dep.claudiodiaz@camara.gov.br"
"dep.cleberverde@camara.gov.br"
"dep.clovisfecury@camara.gov.br"
"dep.colbertmartins@camara.gov.br"
"dep.dagoberto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.dalvafigueiredo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.damiaofeliciano@camara.gov.br"
"dep.danielalmeida@camara.gov.br"
"dep.darcisioperondi@camara.gov.br"
"dep.davialvessilvajunior@camara.gov.br"
"dep.deciolima@camara.gov.br"
"dep.deley@camara.gov.br"
"dep.devanirribeiro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.dilceusperafico@camara.gov.br"
"dep.dimasramalho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.domingosdutra@camara.gov.br"
"dep.dr.adilsonsoares@camara.gov.br"
"dep.dr.nechar@camara.gov.br"
"dep.dr.paulocesar@camara.gov.br"
"dep.dr.rosinha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.dr.talmir@camara.gov.br"
"dep.dr.ubiali@camara.gov.br"
"dep.duartenogueira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.edgarmoury@camara.gov.br"
"dep.edigarmaobranca@camara.gov.br"
"dep.edinhobez@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ediolopes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.edmarmoreira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.edmilsonvalentim@camara.gov.br"
"dep.edsonaparecido@camara.gov.br"
"dep.edsonduarte@camara.gov.br"
"dep.edsonezequiel@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eduardoamorim@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eduardobarbosa@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eduardocunha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eduardodafonte@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eduardogomes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eduardolopes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eduardosciarra@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eduardovalverde@camara.gov.br"
"dep.efraimfilho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.elcionebarbalho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eleusespaiva@camara.gov.br"
"dep.elienelima@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eliseupadilha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.elismarprado@camara.gov.br"
"dep.elizeuaguiar@camara.gov.br"
"dep.emanuelfernandes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.emiliafernandes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.emilianojose@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eniobacci@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ernandesamorim@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eudesxavier@camara.gov.br"
"dep.eugeniorabelo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.euniciooliveira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.evandromilhomen@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fabiofaria@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fabioramalho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fabiosouto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fatimabezerra@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fatimapelaes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.felipebornier@camara.gov.br"
"dep.felipemaia@camara.gov.br"
"dep.felixmendonca@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fernandochiarelli@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fernandochucre@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fernandocoelhofilho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fernandocoruja@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fernandodefabinho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fernandoferro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fernandogabeira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fernandolopes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fernandomarroni@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fernandomelo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.fernandonascimento@camara.gov.br"
"dep.filipepereira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.flavianomelo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.flaviobezerra@camara.gov.br"
"dep.flaviodino@camara.gov.br"
"dep.franciscopraciano@camara.gov.br"
"dep.franciscorodrigues@camara.gov.br"
"dep.franciscorossi@camara.gov.br"
"dep.franciscotenorio@camara.gov.br"
"dep.georgehilton@camara.gov.br"
"dep.geraldinho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.geraldopudim@camara.gov.br"
"dep.geraldoresende@camara.gov.br"
"dep.geraldosimoes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.geraldothadeu@camara.gov.br"
"dep.germanobonow@camara.gov.br"
"dep.gersonperes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.gervasiosilva@camara.gov.br"
"dep.giacobo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.gilmarmachado@camara.gov.br"
"dep.giovanniqueiroz@camara.gov.br"
"dep.givaldocarimbao@camara.gov.br"
"dep.gladsoncameli@camara.gov.br"
"dep.glauberbraga@camara.gov.br"
"dep.gonzagapatriota@camara.gov.br"
"dep.goretepereira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.guilhermecampos@camara.gov.br"
"dep.gustavofruet@camara.gov.br"
"dep.henriqueafonso@camara.gov.br"
"dep.henriqueeduardoalves@camara.gov.br"
"dep.henriquefontana@camara.gov.br"
"dep.hermesparcianello@camara.gov.br"
"dep.homeropereira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.hugoleal@camara.gov.br"
"dep.humbertosouto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ibsenpinheiro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ilderleicordeiro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.indiodacosta@camara.gov.br"
"dep.inocenciooliveira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.iranbarbosa@camara.gov.br"
"dep.irinylopes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.irisdearaujo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ivanvalente@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jacksonbarreto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jaderbarbalho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jaimemartins@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jairbolsonaro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jairoataide@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jairocarneiro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.janetecapiberibe@camara.gov.br"
"dep.janeterochapieta@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jeffersoncampos@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jeronimoreis@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jilmartatto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jomoraes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joaoalmeida@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joaobittar@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joaocampos@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joaocarlosbacelar@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joaodado@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joaomagalhaes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joaomaia@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joaomatos@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joaooliveira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joaopaulocunha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joaopizzolatti@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joaquimbeltrao@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jofranfrejat@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jorgeboeira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jorgekhoury@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jorginhomaluly@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joseairtoncirilo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joseanibal@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josec.stangarlini@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josecarlosaleluia@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josecarlosaraujo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josecarlosmachado@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josecarlosvieira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josechaves@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joseeduardocardozo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josefernandoaparecidodeoliveira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josegenoino@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joseguimaraes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joselinhares@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josemaiafilho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josemendoncabezerra@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josementor@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joseotaviogermano@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josepaulotoffano@camara.gov.br"
"dep.joserocha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josesantanadevasconcellos@camara.gov.br"
"dep.josephbandeira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jovairarantes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.juliaoamin@camara.gov.br"
"dep.juliocesar@camara.gov.br"
"dep.juliodelgado@camara.gov.br"
"dep.juliosemeghini@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jurandiljuarez@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jurandyloureiro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.jutahyjunior@camara.gov.br"
"dep.laelvarella@camara.gov.br"
"dep.laertebessa@camara.gov.br"
"dep.laurezmoreira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.lazarobotelho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.leandrosampaio@camara.gov.br"
"dep.leandrovilela@camara.gov.br"
"dep.lelocoimbra@camara.gov.br"
"dep.leoalcantara@camara.gov.br"
"dep.leovivas@camara.gov.br"
"dep.leonardomonteiro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.leonardoquintao@camara.gov.br"
"dep.leonardovilela@camara.gov.br"
"dep.lidicedamata@camara.gov.br"
"dep.lincolnportela@camara.gov.br"
"dep.lindomargarcon@camara.gov.br"
"dep.liramaia@camara.gov.br"
"dep.lobbeneto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.lucenirapimentel@camara.gov.br"
"dep.lucianacosta@camara.gov.br"
"dep.lucianocastro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luciovale@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luiscarlosheinze@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luizalberto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luizbassuma@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luizbittencourt@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luizcarlosbusato@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luizcarloshauly@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luizcarlossetim@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luizcarreira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luizcouto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luizfernandofaria@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luizpaulovellozolucas@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luizsergio@camara.gov.br"
"dep.luizaerundina@camara.gov.br"
"dep.lupercioramos@camara.gov.br"
"dep.magela@camara.gov.br"
"dep.majorfabio@camara.gov.br"
"dep.manato@camara.gov.br"
"dep.manoeljunior@camara.gov.br"
"dep.manoelsalviano@camara.gov.br"
"dep.manueladavila@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marcalfilho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marceloalmeida@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marcelocastro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marceloguimaraesfilho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marceloitagiba@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marcelomelo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marceloortiz@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marceloserafim@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marceloteixeira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marciofranca@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marciojunqueira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marciomarinho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marcioreinaldomoreira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marcomaia@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marcondesgadelha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marcosantonio@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marcoslima@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marcosmedrado@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marcosmontes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.mariadorosario@camara.gov.br"
"dep.mariahelena@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marialuciacardoso@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marinamaggessi@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marinharaupp@camara.gov.br"
"dep.mariodeoliveira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marioheringer@camara.gov.br"
"dep.marionegromonte@camara.gov.br"
"dep.mauricioquintellalessa@camara.gov.br"
"dep.mauriciorands@camara.gov.br"
"dep.mauriciotrindade@camara.gov.br"
"dep.maurobenevides@camara.gov.br"
"dep.maurolopes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.mauronazif@camara.gov.br"
"dep.mendesribeirofilho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.mendoncaprado@camara.gov.br"
"dep.micheltemer@camara.gov.br"
"dep.miguelcorrea@camara.gov.br"
"dep.miguelmartini@camara.gov.br"
"dep.miltonmonti@camara.gov.br"
"dep.miltonvieira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.miroteixeira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.moacirmicheletto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.moisesavelino@camara.gov.br"
"dep.moreiramendes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.narciorodrigues@camara.gov.br"
"dep.natandonadon@camara.gov.br"
"dep.nazarenofonteles@camara.gov.br"
"dep.neiltonmulim@camara.gov.br"
"dep.nelsonbornier@camara.gov.br"
"dep.nelsongoetten@camara.gov.br"
"dep.nelsonmarquezelli@camara.gov.br"
"dep.nelsonmeurer@camara.gov.br"
"dep.nelsonproenca@camara.gov.br"
"dep.nelsontrad@camara.gov.br"
"dep.neudocampos@camara.gov.br"
"dep.nicelobao@camara.gov.br"
"dep.nilmarruiz@camara.gov.br"
"dep.nilsonmourao@camara.gov.br"
"dep.nilsonpinto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.odaircunha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.odiliobalbinotti@camara.gov.br"
"dep.olavocalheiros@camara.gov.br"
"dep.onyxlorenzoni@camara.gov.br"
"dep.osmarjunior@camara.gov.br"
"dep.osmarserraglio@camara.gov.br"
"dep.osorioadriano@camara.gov.br"
"dep.osvaldobiolchi@camara.gov.br"
"dep.osvaldoreis@camara.gov.br"
"dep.otavioleite@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paesdelira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paeslandim@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pastormanoelferreira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pastorpedroribeiro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pauloabiackel@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paulobornhausen@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paulodelgado@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paulohenriquelustosa@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paulomagalhaes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paulomaluf@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paulopereiradasilva@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paulopiau@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paulopimenta@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paulorattes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paulorobertopereira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paulorocha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.paulorubemsantiago@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pauloteixeira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pedrochaves@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pedroeugenio@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pedrofernandes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pedrohenry@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pedronovais@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pedrowilson@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pepevargas@camara.gov.br"
"dep.perpetuaalmeida@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pintoitamaraty@camara.gov.br"
"dep.pompeodemattos@camara.gov.br"
"dep.professorruypauletti@camara.gov.br"
"dep.professorsetimo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.professorvictoriogalli@camara.gov.br"
"dep.professoraraquelteixeira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.rafaelguerra@camara.gov.br"
"dep.raimundogomesdematos@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ratinhojunior@camara.gov.br"
"dep.raulhenry@camara.gov.br"
"dep.rauljungmann@camara.gov.br"
"dep.rebeccagarcia@camara.gov.br"
"dep.reginaldolopes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.regisdeoliveira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.renatoamary@camara.gov.br"
"dep.renatomolling@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ribamaralves@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ricardobarros@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ricardoberzoini@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ricardoquirino@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ricardotripoli@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ritacamata@camara.gov.br"
"dep.robertoalves@camara.gov.br"
"dep.robertobritto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.robertomagalhaes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.robertorocha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.robertosantiago@camara.gov.br"
"dep.rodovalho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.rodrigodecastro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.rodrigomaia@camara.gov.br"
"dep.rodrigorochaloures@camara.gov.br"
"dep.rodrigorollemberg@camara.gov.br"
"dep.rogeriolisboa@camara.gov.br"
"dep.rogeriomarinho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.romulogouveia@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ronaldocaiado@camara.gov.br"
"dep.rosedefreitas@camara.gov.br"
"dep.rubensotoni@camara.gov.br"
"dep.sabinocastelobranco@camara.gov.br"
"dep.sandesjunior@camara.gov.br"
"dep.sandrarosado@camara.gov.br"
"dep.sandromabel@camara.gov.br"
"dep.saraivafelipe@camara.gov.br"
"dep.sarneyfilho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.sebastiaobalarocha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.sergiobarradascarneiro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.sergiobrito@camara.gov.br"
"dep.sergiomoraes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.sergiopetecao@camara.gov.br"
"dep.severianoalves@camara.gov.br"
"dep.silasbrasileiro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.silascamara@camara.gov.br"
"dep.silviocosta@camara.gov.br"
"dep.silviolopes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.silviotorres@camara.gov.br"
"dep.simaosessim@camara.gov.br"
"dep.solangealmeida@camara.gov.br"
"dep.solangeamaral@camara.gov.br"
"dep.suelividigal@camara.gov.br"
"dep.suely@camara.gov.br"
"dep.tadeufilippelli@camara.gov.br"
"dep.takayama@camara.gov.br"
"dep.tatico@camara.gov.br"
"dep.thelmadeoliveira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.tonhamagalhaes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.ulduricopinto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.urzenirocha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vadaogomes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.valadaresfilho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.valdemarcostaneto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.valdircolatto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.valtenirpereira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vanderloubet@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vanderleimacris@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vanessagrazziotin@camara.gov.br"
"dep.veloso@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vicpiresfranco@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vicentearruda@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vicentinho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vicentinhoalves@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vieiradacunha@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vignatti@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vilsoncovatti@camara.gov.br"
"dep.viniciuscarvalho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.virgilioguimaraes@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vitaldoregofilho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.vitorpenido@camara.gov.br"
"dep.waldemirmoka@camara.gov.br"
"dep.walterihoshi@camara.gov.br"
"dep.wandenkolkgoncalves@camara.gov.br"
"dep.washingtonluiz@camara.gov.br"
"dep.wellingtonroberto@camara.gov.br"
"dep.williamwoo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.wilsonbraga@camara.gov.br"
"dep.wilsonpicler@camara.gov.br"
"dep.wilsonsantiago@camara.gov.br"
"dep.wladimircosta@camara.gov.br"
"dep.wolneyqueiroz@camara.gov.br"
"dep.zegeraldo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.zegerardo@camara.gov.br"
"dep.zevieira@camara.gov.br"
"dep.zenaldocoutinho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.zequinhamarinho@camara.gov.br"
"dep.zezeuribeiro@camara.gov.br"
"dep.zonta@camara.gov.br"

Como governamos o Mundo.

2009-07-22T15:25:00.009-03:00

Assista e saiba como você governa seu Mundo.

Transcrição do filme.
Part 1
"The old appeals to racial, sexual and religious chauvinism, to rabid nationalist fervor, are beginning not to work."
" …this business of who I am and weather I`m good or bad, or achieving or not, all of that`s learned along the way."
"It`s just a ride…and we can change it any time we want. It`s only a choice. No effort, no work, no job, no savings of money…"

"…to realize that I had the game wrong, that the game was to find out what I already was."

"We were saying how very important it is to bring about in the human mind the radical revolution. The crisis is a crisis in consciousness. The crisis that cannot anymore accept the old norms, the old patterns, the ancient traditions. And, considering what the world is now, with all the misery, conflict, destructive brutality, aggression, and so on, man is still as he was. He is still brutal, violent, aggressive, acquisitive, competitive-and he has built a society along these lines.

[ ZEITGEIST ADDENDUM ]
[ "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society" -J. Krishnamurti ]
Society today is composed of a series of institutions…from political institutions, legal institutions, religious institutions… to institutions of social class, familial values
and occupational specialization. It is obvious the profound influence these traditionalized structures have in shaping our understandings and perspectives…
Yet, of all the social institutions we are born into, directed by and conditioned upon, there seems to be no system as taken for granted and misunderstood…as the monetary system. Taking on nearly religious proportions, the established monetary institution exists as one of the most unquestioned forms of faith there is. How money is created, the policies by which it is governed and how it truly affects society are unregistered interests of the great majority of the population.
In a world where 1% of the population owns 40% of the planet's wealth…in a world where 34,000 children die every single day from poverty and preventable diseases, and where 50% of the world's population lives on less than 2 dollars a day… one thing is clear:
Something is very wrong.
And whether we are aware of it or not, the lifeblood of all of our established institutions and thus society itself, is money. Therefore understanding this institution of monetary policy is critical to understanding why our lives are the way they are.
Unfortunately, economics is often viewed with confusion and boredom. Endless streams of financial jargon coupled with intimidating mathematics quickly deter people from attempts at understanding it. However, the fact is, the complexity associated with the financial system is a mere mask, designed to conceal one of the most socially paralyzing structures humanity has ever endured.
[PART 1. "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."-Johann Wolfgang von Goethe-1749-1832]
A number of years ago, the central bank of the United States, the Federal Reserve, produced a document entitled "Modern Money Mechanics". This publication detailed the institutionalized practice of money creation, as utilized by the Federal Reserve and the web of global commercial banks it supports. On the opening page, the document states its objective: "The Purpose of this booklet is to describe the basic process of money creation in a fractional reserve banking system". It then proceeds to describe this 'fractional reserve process' through various banking terminology. A translation of which goes something like this:
The United States Government decides it needs some money, so it calls up the Federal Reserve, and requests, say, 10 billion dollars". The fed replies, saying " sure… we'll buy 10 billion in government bonds from you."
So, the government then takes some piece of paper, paints some official looking designs on them, and calls them 'Treasury Bonds'. Then, it puts a value on these Bonds to the sum of 10 billion dollars, and sends them over to the Fed. In turn, the people at the Fed draw up a bunch of impressive pieces of paper themselves, only this time calling them 'Federal Reserve Notes'…also designating a value of 10 billion dollars to the set.
The Fed then takes these notes and trades them for the Bonds. Once this exchange is complete, the government then takes the 10 billion in Federal Reserve Notes and deposits it into a bank account…and upon this deposit, the paper notes officially become 'legal tender' money, adding 10 billion to the US money supply. And there it is… 10 billion in new money has been created. Of course, this example is a generalization, for, in reality, this transaction would occur electronically, with no paper used at all. In fact only 3% of the US money supply exists in physical currency. The other 97% essentially exists in computers alone.
Now, Government bonds are, by design, instruments of Debt and when the Fed purchases these bonds, with money it created essentially out of thin air, the government is actually promising to pay back that money to the Fed.
In other words… The money was created out of debt. This mind numbing paradox of how money, or value, can be created out of debt, or a liability, will become more clear as we further this exercise.
So, the exchange has been made and now 10 billion dollars sits in a commercial bank account. Here is where it gets really interesting, for as based on the Fractional Reserve practice, that 10 billion dollar deposit instantly becomes part of the bank's Reserves, just as all deposits do. And regarding reserve requirements, as stated in Modern money mechanics:
A bank must maintain legally required reserves, equal to a prescribed percentage of its deposits. It then quantifies this by stating: under current regulations, the reserve requirement against most transaction accounts is 10%."
This means that with a ten billion dollar deposit, 10% or 1 billion is held as the required reserve, while the other 9 billion is considered an excessive reserve and can be used as the basis for new loans.
Now, it is logical to assume that this 9 billion is literally coming out of the existing 10 billion dollars deposit. However, this is actually not the case. What really happens is that the 9 billion is simply created out of thin air, on top of the existing 10 billion dollar deposit. This is how the money supply is expanded. As stated in Modern Money Mechanics: " of course, they (the banks) do not really pay out loans from the money they receive as deposits. If they did this, no additional money would be created. What they do when they make loans is to accept promissory notes (loan contracts) in exchange for credits (money) to the borrower's transaction accounts."
In other words, the 9 billion can be created out of nothing, simply because there is a demand for such a loan, and there is a 10 billion dollars deposit to satisfy the reserve requirements.
Now, let's assume that somebody walks into this bank and borrows the available 9 billion dollars. They will then most likely take that money and deposit it into their own bank account.
The process then repeats, for that deposit becomes part of the banks reserves, 10% is isolated and in turn 90% of the 9 billion or 8.1 billion is now available as newly created money for more loans. And, of course, that 8.1 can be loaned out and redeposited creating an additional 7.2 billion…to 6.5 billion.. to 5.9 billion etc.
This deposit-money creation-loan cycle can technically go on to infinity… the average mathematical result is that about 90 billion dollars can be created on top of the original 10 billion. In other words, for every deposit that ever occurs in the banking system, about 9 times that amount can be created out of thin air.
[Bank of America commercial]
So that we understand how money is created by this fractional reserve banking system,
a logical, yet elusive question might come to mind:
What is actually giving this newly created money value?
The answer: The money that already exists.
The new money essentially steals value from the existing money supply… for the total pool of money is being increased, irrespective to demand for goods and services, and, as supply and demand finds equilibrium- prices rise, diminishing the purchasing power of each individual dollar. This is generally referred to as 'inflation' and inflation is essentially a hidden tax on the public.
(Ron Paul) : "…what is the advice that you generally get, and that is inflate the currency. They don`t say debase the currency, they don`t say devalue the currency, they don`t say cheat the people with savings, they say lower the interest rates. The real deception is when we distort the value of money, when we create money out of thin air, we have no savings yet there`s so called capitol…so my question boils down to this-how in the world can we expect to solve the problems of inflation--that is the increase in the supply of money-- with more inflation? "
Of course, it can't. The Fractional Reserve System of monetary expansion is inherently
inflationary. For the act of expanding the money supply without there being a proportional expand of good and services in the economy, will always debase a currency..
In fact a quick glance at the historical values of the US dollars Vs the money supply,
Reflects this point definitively, for the inverse relationship is obvious.
In fact, One dollar in 1913 required 21.60 cents in 2007, to match value…that is a 96% devaluation since the Federal reserve has come into existence.
Now, if this realty of inherent and perpetual inflation seems absurd and economically
self-defeating… hold that thought, for absurdity is an understatement in regard to how our financial system really operates.
For in our financial system money is debt and debt is money. Here is a chart of the US money supply from 1950 to 2006. Here is a chart of the US national debt for the same period. How interesting it is that the trends are nearly identical… for the more money there is, the more debt there is… the more debt there is, the more money there is.
To put it a different way, every single dollar in your wallet is owed to somebody by somebody; for remember, the only way the money can come into existence is from loans. Therefore, if everyone in the country were able to pay off all debts, including the government, there would not be one dollar in circulation.
(If there were no debts in our money system, there wouldn`t be any money"
-Marriner Eccles-Governor of the Federal Reserve
September 30th, 1941 -House Committee Hearing on Banking and Currency )
In fact, the last time in American history the national debt was completely paid off was in 1835, after President Andrew Jackson shutdown the Central Bank that preceded the Federal Reserve. In fact Jackson's entire political platform essentially revolved around his commitment to shut down the Central Bank, stating at one point: " the bold efforts the present bank has made to control the government are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it." Unfortunately his message was short lived, and the international bankers succeeded to install another central bank in 1913…The Federal Reserve. And as long as this institution exists, perpetual debt is guaranteed.
Now, so far we have discussed the reality that money is created out of debt, through loans.
These loans are based on a bank's "Reserves" and Reserves are derived from deposits. Through this fractional reserve system, any one deposit can create 9 times its original value, in turn debasing the existing money supply, raising prices in society.
And since all this money is created out of debt and circulated randomly through commerce, people become detached from their original debt and a disequilibrium exists where people are forced to compete for labor, in order to pull enough money out of the money supply to cover their costs of living.
As dysfunctional and backwards as all of this might seem… there is still one thing we have omitted from this equation… and it is this element of the structure which reveals the truly fraudulent nature of the system itself.
-The application of Interest. When the government borrows money from the Fed or when person borrows money from a bank, it almost always has to be paid back with accrued interest. In other words, almost every single dollar that exists must be eventually returned to a bank, with interest paid as well. But, if all money is borrowed from the central bank and is expanded by the commercial banks through loans, only what would be referred to as the 'principle' is being created in the money supply…. So then, where is the money to cover all of the interest that is charged?
Nowhere. It doesn't exist. The ramifications of this are staggering, for the amount of money owed back to the banks will always exceed the amount of money that is available in circulation. This is why Inflation is a constant in the economy, for new money is always needed to help cover the perpetual deficit built into the system, caused by the
the need to pay the interest.
What this also means is that mathematically, defaults and bankruptcy are literally built into the system. And there will always be poor pockets of society that get the short end of the stick. An analogy would be a game of musical chairs, for once the music stops someone is left out to dry.
And that's the point. It invariably transfers true wealth from the individual to the banks, for if you are unable to pay for your mortgage, they will take your property. This is particularly enraging when you realize that not only is such a default inevitable due to the fractional reserve practice, but also because of the fact that the money that the bank loaned to you didn't even legally exist in the first place.

In the 1969, there was a Minnesota court case involving a man named Jerome Daly, who was challenging the foreclosure of his home by the bank, which provided the loan to purchase it. His argument was that the mortgage contract required both parties, being he and the bank, each put up a legitimate form of property for the exchange. In legal language, this is called "consideration".
(Consideration: -a contract`s basis. A contract is founded on an exchange of one form of consideration for another.)
Mr. Daly explained that the money was, in fact, not the property of the bank, for it was created out of nothing as soon as the loan agreement was signed.
Remember what modern money mechanics stated about loans: "what they do when they make loans is to accept promissory notes in exchange for credits…Reserves are unchanged by the loan transactions. But deposit credits constitute new additions to the total deposits of the banking system." In other words, the money doesn't come out of any of their existing assets. The bank is simply inventing it, putting up nothing of its own except for a theoretical liability on paper.
As the court case progressed, the banks president, Mr. Morgan, took the stand, and in the judge's personal memorandum, he recalled that "The Plaintiff (bank's president) admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank…did create the…money and credit upon its books by bookkeeping entry…the money and credit first came into existence when they created it…Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States law or statute existed which gave him the right to do this…a lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the note." "The jury found that there was no lawful consideration and I agree" He also poetically added, " Only God can create something of value out of nothing"
And upon that revelation, the court rejected the bank's claim for foreclosure and Daly kept his home. The implications of this court decision are immense, for every time you borrow money from a bank, whether it is a mortgage loan or a credit card charge, the money given to you is not only counterfeit, it is an illegitimate form of consideration and hence voids the contract to repay… for the bank never had the money as property to begin with. Unfortunately, such legal realizations are suppressed and ignored, and the game of perpetual wealth transfer and perpetual debt continues….
And this brings us to the ultimate question: why?
During the American civil war president Lincoln bypassed the high-interest loans offered by the European banks and decided to do what the founding fathers advocated, which was to create an independent and inherently debt-free currency. It was called the Greenback. Shortly after this measure was taken, an internal document circulated between private British and American banking interests stated:
"…slavery is but the owning of labor and carries with it the care of laborers, while the European plan…is that capital shall control labor by controlling wages. This can be done by controlling the money. It will not do to allow the greenback, as we cannot control that."-The Hazard Circular, July, 1862
The fractional reserve policy perpetrated by the Federal Reserve, which has spread in practice to the great majority of banks in the world is, in fact, a system of modern slavery. Think about it… Money is created out of debt. And what do people do when in debt? They submit to employment to pay it off. But, if money can only be created out of loans, how can society ever be debt free? It can't. And that's the point.
And it is the fear of losing assets, coupled with the struggle to keep up with the perpetual debt and inflation inherent in the system, compounded by the inescapable scarcity within the money supply itself created by the interest that can never be repaid… that keeps the wage slave in line… running on the hamster wheel with the millions of others… in effect powering an Empire that truly benefits only the elite at the top of the pyramid… for at the end of day, who are you really working for? The banks. Money is created in a bank and invariably ends up in a bank. They are the true masters along with corporations and governments they support.
Physical slavery requires people to be housed and fed. Economic slavery requires the people to feed and house themselves
It is one of the most ingenious scams for social manipulation ever created, and at its core, it is an invisible war against the population. Debt is the weapon used to conquer and enslave societies and Interest is its prime ammunition.
And as the majority walks around oblivious to this reality, the banks, in collusion with governments and corporations, continue to perfect and expand their tactics of economic warfare…spawning new bases… such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund… while also inventing a new type of soldier… the birth of the economic hit man.

PART 2
( There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by the sword. The other is by debt.-John Adams-1735-1826)
'John Perkins':
We economic hit men really have been the ones responsible for creating this first truly global empire, and we work many different ways…but perhaps the most common is that we will identify a country that has resources that our corporations covet, like oil, and then arrange a huge loan to that country from the World Bank or one of its sister organizations. But the money never actually goes to the country…instead it goes to our big corporations to build infrastructure projects in that country-power plants, industrial parks, ports-things that benefit a few rich people in that country, in addition to our corporations-but really don`t help the majority of the people at all…however those people, the whole country, is left holding a huge debt. Its such a big debt that they can`t repay it, and that`s part of the plan, that they can`t repay it. And so at some point we economic hit men go back to them and say listen, you owe us a lot of money, can`t pay your debts, so, sell your oil real cheap to our oil companies…allow us to build a military base in your country…or, send troops in support of ours to someplace in the world, like Iraq…or vote with us on the next U.N. vote…to have their electric utility company privatized, and their water and sewage system privatized, and sold to US corporations or other multinational corporations. So there was a whole mushrooming thing, and it`s so typical of the way that the IMF and the World Bank work: they put a country in debt, in such a big debt it can`t pay it, and then you offer to refinance that debt, and pay even more interest, and you demand this quid pro quo which you call a "conditionality" or "good governance" which means basically that they`ve got to sell off their resources, including many of their social services; their utility companies; their school systems sometimes; their penal systems; their insurance systems, to foreign corporations. So its a double, triple, quadruple whammy.
(Iran, 1953)
The precedent for economic hit men really began in the early fifties, when democratically elected Mossadegh, who was elected in Iran…he was considered to be the hope for democracy in the Middle East and around the world…he was Time Magazine`s "Man of the Year"…but, one of the things that he`d run on and began to implement was the idea that foreign oil companies needed to pay the Iranian people a lot more for the oil that they were taking out of Iran, that the Iranian people should benefit from their own oil. Strange policy. We didn't like that of course. But we were afraid to do what we normally were doing, which was to send in the military. Instead we sent in one CIA agent, Kermit Roosevelt, Teddy Roosevelt's relative…and Kermit went in with a few million dollars and was very, very effective and efficient, and in a short amount of time he managed to get Mossadegh overthrown…and brought in the Shah of Iran to replace him, who always was favorable to oil…and it was extremely effective.
(Revolt in Iran)
VOICE:
Mobs overflow Tehran. Army officers shout that Mossadegh has surrendered, and his regime as virtual dictator of Iran is ended. Pictures of the Shah paraded through the streets as sentiment reverses. The Shah is welcomed home.
JOHN:
So back here in the United States in Washington people looked around and said, wow, that was easy. And cheap. So this established a whole new way of manipulating countries, of creating empire. The only problem with Roosevelt was that he was a card carrying CIA agent, and had he been caught, the ramifications could have been pretty serious. So very quickly at that point the decision was made to use private consultants, to channel the money through the World Bank or the IMF or one of the other such agencies, to bring in people like me who work for private companies…so that if we got caught there would be no governmental ramifications.
(Guatemala 1954)
When Arbenz became president of Guatemala, the country was very much under the thumbs of United Fruit Company, the big international corporation, and Arbenz ran on this ticket that says you know, we want to get the land back to the people, and once he took power he was implementing policies that would do exactly that, give land rights back to the people. United Fruit didn`t like that very much, and so they hired a public relations firm, launched a huge campaign in the United States to convince the United States people, the citizens of the United States, and the press of the United States, and the congress of the United States that Arbenz was a Soviet puppet, and that if we allowed him to stay in power the Soviets would have a foothold in this hemisphere, and that at that point in time was a huge fear on everybody's mind, the red terror, the communist terror…and so to make a long story short, out of this public relations campaign came a commitment on the part of the CIA and the military to take this man out…and in fact we did. we sent in planes, we sent in soldiers, we sent in jackals, we sent everything in to take him out, and did take him out. And as soon as he was removed from office, the new guy that took over after him basically reinstated everything to the big international corporations, including United Fruit.
(Ecuador 1981)
Ecuador for many, many years had been ruled by pro-US dictators, often relatively brutal. Then it was decided that they were going to have a truly democratic election. Jaime Roldos ran for office, and his main goal he said as president would be to make sure that Ecuador's resources were used to help the people. And he won, overwhelmingly, by more votes than anyone had ever won anything in Ecuador, and he began to implement these policies…to make sure that the profits from oil went to help the people…well, we didn`t like that in the United States. I was sat down as one of several economic hit men, to change Roldos, to corrupt him, to bring him around. To let him know, you know, ok, you know, you can get very rich you and your family if you play our game, but if you continue to try to keep these policies you`ve promised, you`re gonna go… he wouldn`t listen.
(Ecuadorian leader dies in plane crash)
He was assassinated. As soon as the plane crashed, the whole area was cordoned off. The only people that were allowed in were US military from a nearby base, and some of the Ecuadorian military. When investigation was launched, two of the key witnesses died in car accidents before they had a chance to testify. A lot of very, very strange things that went on around the assassination of Jaime Roldos. I, like most people who`ve really looked at this case, have absolutely no doubt that it was an assassination, and of course in my position as an economic hit man I was always expecting something to happen to Jaime, weather it be a coup or an assassination I wasn`t sure, but that he would be taken down because he was not being corrupted, he would not allow himself to be corrupted the way we wanted to corrupt him.
(Panama 1981)
Omar Torrijos, president of Panama, was one of my favorite people, I really, really liked him, he was very charismatic, he was a guy who really wanted to help his country. When I tried to bribe him or corrupt him he said, look John… he called me Juanito…he said, look Juanito, I don`t need the money. What I really need is for my country to be treated fairly. I need for the United States to repay the debts that you owe my people for all the destruction you`ve done here. I need to be in a position where I can help other Latin American countries win their independence, and be free of this terrible presence from the north that you people are exploiting us so badly. I need to have the Panama canal back in the hands of the Panamanian people. That`s what I want. And so leave me alone, don`t try to bribe me. It was 1981, and in may Jaime Roldos was assassinated, and Omar was very aware of this. Torrijos got his family together and he said, I`m probably next. But it`s ok, because I`ve done what I came here to do. I`ve renegotiated the canal, the canal will now be in our hands…he`d just finished negotiating the treaty with Jimmy Carter. In June of that same year, just a couple of months later, he also went down in an airplane crash…which there`s no question was executed by CIA sponsored Jackals. Tremendous amount of evidence that one of Torrijos' security guards handed him at the last moment as he was getting on the plane a tape recorder, a small tape recorder, that contained a bomb.
(Venezuela 2002)
It is interesting to me how this system has continued pretty much the same way for years and years and years, except the economic hit men are getting better and better and better. Then we come up with, very recently, what happened in Venezuela. In 1998 Hugo Chavez gets elected president, following a long line of presidents who`d been very corrupt, and basically destroyed the economy of the country…and Chavez was elected amidst all that. Chavez stood up to the United States, and he has done it primarily demanding that Venezuelan oil be used to help the Venezuelan people. Well, we didn`t like that in the United States. So, in 2002 the coup was staged, which, there`s no question in my mind and most other peoples minds that the CIA was behind that coup. The way that that coup was fomented was very reflective of what Kermit Roosevelt had done in Iran, of paying people to go out into the streets to riot, to protest, to say this Chavez is very unpopular. You know, if you can get a few thousand people to do that, television can make it look like its the whole country, and things start to mushroom. Except in the case of Chavez, he was smart enough and the people were so strongly behind him that they overcame it. Which was a phenomenal moment in the history of Latin America.
(Iraq 2003)
Iraq actually is a perfect example of the way the whole system works…so, we economic hit men are the first line of defense, we go in, we try to corrupt governments and get them to accept these huge loans which we then use as leverage to basically own them. If we fail, as I failed in Panama with Omar Torrijos, or in Ecuador with Jaime Roldos, men who refused to be corrupted, then the second line of defense is we send in the jackals. And the jackals either overthrow governments or they assassinate, and once that happens then a new government comes in and boy, it`s going to tow the line, because the new president knows what will happen if he doesn't. In the case of Iraq, both of those things failed-economic hit men were not able to get through to Saddam Hussain, we tried very hard, we tried to get him to accept a deal very similar to what the house of Saud had accepted in Saudi Arabia, but he wouldn`t accept it, and so the jackals went in to take him out…they couldn`t do it, his security was very good…after all, he at one time worked for the CIA. he`d been hired to assassinate a former president if Iraq, and failed…but he knew the system. So in '91 we send in the troops, and we take out the Iraqi military. So we assume at that point that Saddam Hussain is going to come around. We could have taken him out, of course, at that point in time, but we didn`t want to, he`s the kind of strong man we like. He controls his people, we thought he could control the Kurds and keep the Iranians within their border, and keep pumping oil for us, and that once we took out his military, now he`s going to come around. So the economic hit men go back in in the '90s, without success. If they`d had success, he`d still be running the country. We`d be selling him all the fighter jets he wants, and everything else he wants… but they couldn`t, they didn`t have success. The Jackals couldn`t take him out again. So we sent the military in once again, and this time we did the complete job and took him out, and in the process created for ourselves some very, very lucrative construction deals…we had to reconstruct a country that we`d essentially destroyed, which is a pretty good deal if you own construction companies, big ones. So, Iraq shows the three stages; the economic hit men, failed there; the jackals, failed there; and as a final measure the military goes in. And in that way we`ve really created an empire, but we`ve done it very, very subtly…it`s clandestine. All of the empires of the past were built on the military. And everybody knew that they were building them. So that the British knew they were building them….the French, the Germans, the Romans, the Greeks…and they were proud of it, and they always had some excuse like spreading civilization, spreading some religion, something like that, but they knew they were doing it…we don`t. The majority of the people in the United States have no idea that we are living off the benefits of a clandestine empire, that today there`s more slavery in the world than ever before. And then you have to ask yourself, well if it`s an empire, then who`s the emperor? Obviously, our presidents of the United States are not emperors, an emperor is someone who`s not elected, doesn`t serve a limited term, and doesn`t report to anyone, essentially. So you can`t classify a president that way. But we do have what I consider to be the equivalent of the emperor, and it`s what I call the Corporatocracy. Corporatocracy is this group of individuals who run our biggest corporations and they really act as the emperor in this empire. They control our media, either through direct ownership or advertising, they control most of our politicians because they finance their campaigns, either through the corporations or through personal contributions that came out of the corporations. They`re not elected, they don`t serve a limited term, they don`t report to anybody, and at the very top of the corporatocracy you really can`t tell where the person`s working for a private corporation or the government because they`re always moving back and forth…so, you know, you`ve got a guy who one moment is the president of a big construction company, like Haliburton, and the next moment he`s vice president of the United States, or the president, who was in the oil business, and this is true weather you`ve got democrats or republicans in the office, you have them moving back and forth through the revolving door…and in a way, our government isn`t visible a lot of the time and its policies are carried out by our corporations on one level or another, and then again, the policies of the government are basically forged by the corporatacracy, and then presented to the government and they become government policy. So it`s an incredible cozy relationship. This isn`t a conspiracy theory type of thing, these people don`t have to get together and plot to do things, they all basically work under one primary assumption, and that is that they must maximize profits, regardless of the social and environmental cost
(Maximize profits, regardless of the social and environmental cost).
This process of manipulation by the corporatacracy through the use of debt, bribery and, political overthrow is called "Globalization". Just as the federal reserve keeps the American public in a position of indentured servitude through Perpetual Debt, Inflation and Interest, the World Bank and IMF serve this role on a global scale.
The basic scam is simple. Put a country in debt either by its own indiscretion or through corrupting the leader of that country, then , impose conditionalities, or Structural Adjustment Policies…often consisting of the following:
1- Currency Devaluation. When the value of a currency drops, so does everything valued in it. This makes indigenous resources available to predator countries, at a fraction of their worth.
2- Large funding cuts for Social Programs, These usually include education and health care. …compromising the well-being and integrity of the society, leaving the public vulnerable to exploitation.
3 -Privatization of state-owned enterprises… This means that socially important systems, can be purchased and regulated by foreign corporations, for profit. For example, in 1999, the world bank insisted that the Bolivian Government sell the public water system of it third largest city to a subsidy of the US corporation, Bechtel. As soon as this occurred, water bills for the already impoverish local residents skyrocketed. It wasn't until after a full blown revolt by the people that the Bechtel contract was nullified.
4 Then there is trade liberalization.. or the opening up of the economy through removing any restrictions on foreign trade. This allows for a number of
abusive economic manifestations… such as transnational corporations bringing in their own mass produced products, undercutting the indigenous production and ruining local economies…an example is Jamaica, which, after accepting loans and conditionalities from the world bank, lost its largest cash crop markets due to competition with western imports. Today, countless farmers are out of work, for they are unable to compete with the large corporations.
Another variation is the creation of numerous, seemingly unnoticed, unregulated, inhumane sweatshop factories, which take advantage of the imposed economic hardship. Additionally, due to production deregulation, environmental destruction is perpetual, as a country's resources are often exploited by the indifferent corporations, while outputting large amounts of deliberate pollution.
PERKINS:
The largest environmental lawsuit in the history of the world today is being brought on behalf of 30,000 Ecuadorian Amazonian people, against Texaco, which is now owned by Chevron, so its against Chevron but for activities conducted by Texaco….they estimate it to be more than eighteen times what the Exxon Valdese dumped into the coast of Alaska…in the case of Ecuador it wasn`t an accident…the oil companies did it intentionally, they knew they were doing it to save money out there rather than arranging for a proper disposal.
Furthermore, A cursory glance at the performance record of the World Bank reveals that the institution, which publicly claims to help poor countries develop and alleviate poverty, has done nothing but increase poverty and the wealth gap, while corporate profits soar. In 1960 the income gap between the 5th of the world's people in the richest countries, versus the 5th in the poorest countries was 30:1. By 1998, it was 74:1.While global GNP rose 40% between 1970 and 1985, those in poverty actually increased by 17% While from 1985 to 2000, those living on less than 1 dollar a day increased by 18%.
Even the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress admitted that there is a mere 40% success rate of all World Bank projects.

In the late 1960s, The world Bank intervened in Ecuador with large loans. During the next 30 yrs, poverty grew from 50% to 70%…under or unemployment grew from 15% to 70%… public debt increased from 240 million to 16 billion….while the share of resources allocated to the poor went from 20% to 6%.
In fact, By the year 2000, 50% of Ecuador's national budget had to be allocated for paying its debts.
It is important to understand, The World Bank is, in fact, a US bank, supporting US interests. For the United States holds veto power over decisions, as it is largest provider of capital… and where did it get this money? You guessed it….it made it out of thin air through the fractional reserve banking system.
Of the world's top 100 economies, as based on the annual GDP, 51 are corporations,
And 47 of that 51 are US based. Wal-mart, General Motors and Exxon are more economically powerful than Saudi Arabia, Poland, Norway, South Africa, Finland, Indonesia and many others….
… and as protective trade barriers are broken down, currencies tossed together and manipulated in floating markets and state economies overturned in favor of open competition and global capitalism, the empire expands.
NETWORK CLIP :
You get up on your little twenty-one inch screen, and howl about America and democracy…there is no America, there is no democracy…there is only IBM and ITT…and AT&T…and Dupont, Dow, Union Carbine…and Exxon. Those are the nations of the world today. What do you thing the Russians talk about in their consuls of state? Karl Marx? They get out their linear programming charts, statistical decision theories, minimax solutions, and compute the price cost probabilities of their transactions and investments, just like we do. We no longer live in a world of nations and ideologies, Mr. Beale. The world is a college of corporations, inexorably determined by the immutable bylaws of business. The world is a business, Mr. Beale .
(Taken cumulatively, the integration of the world as a whole, particularly in terms of economic globalization and the mythic qualities of "free market" capitalism, represents a veritable "empire" in its own right…few have been able to escape the "structural adjustments" and "conditionalities" of the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, or the arbitrations of the World Trade Organization, those international financial institutions that, however inadequate, still determine what economic globalization means….such is the power of globalization that within our lifetime we are likely to see the integration, even if unevenly, of all national economies in the world into a single global, free market system.
--Jim Garrison, President, State of the World Forum )
the world is being taken over by a handful of business powers, who dominate the natural resources we need to live, while controlling the money that we need to obtain these resources. The end result will be world monopoly, based not human life, but financial and corporate power.
and as the inequality continues, naturally more and more people are becoming desperate…. so the establishment was forced to come up with a new way to deal with anyone who challenges the system…so they gave birth to the terrorist.. The term terrorist is an empty distinction, designed for any person or group who chooses to challenge the Establishment.
This isn't to be confused with the fictional Al Qaeda, which was actually the name of a computer database for the US supported mujahideen in the 1980s .
("The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity…the country behind this propaganda is the US" -Pierre-Henry Bunel, former French military intelligence )
In 2007, the department of defense received 161.8 billion dollars for the so called "global war on terrorism". According to the National Counter terrorism Center, in 2004 roughly 2000 people were killed internationally due to supposed terrorist acts. Of that number, about 70 were American. Using this number as a general average, which is extremely generous, …it is interesting to note than twice as many people die from peanut allergies a year, than from terrorist acts. Concurrently, the leading cause of death in America is coronary heart disease, killing roughly 450,000 each yr. And, in 2007, the government`s allocation of funds for research on this issue was about 3 billion dollars.
This means that the US government in 2007 spent 54 times the amount for preventing terrorism , than it spent for preventing a disease which kills 6600 times more
people annually than terrorism does.
Yet, as the name Terrorism and Al-Qaida are arbitrarily stamped on every news report relating to any action taken against US interests, the myth grows wider… in mid 2008, the US attorney general actually proposed that the US congress officially declare war against the fantasy. Not to mention as of july 2008, there are now over 1 million people currently on the "US terrorist watch list"
These so-called counter terrorism measures of course have nothing to do with social protection… and everything to do with preserving the establishment amongst the growing anti-American sentiment both domestically and internationally…, which is legitimately founded on the greed based corporate empire expansion that is exploiting the world.
The true terrorists of our world do not meet at the docks at midnight… or scream allahu akbar before some violent action. The true terrorists of our world wear 5000 dollar suits and work in highest position finance, government and business…
So what do we do?… how do we stop a system of greed and corruption that has so much power and momentum. How do we stop this aberrant group behavior which feels no compassion for, say, the million slaughtered in Iraq and Afghanistan so the Corporatocracy can control energy resources and opium production for Wall street profit?
( Before 1980, Afghanistan produced 0% of the world`s opium; After the US/CIA backed Mujahideen won the Soviet/Afghan war, by 1986 they were producing 40% of the world`s heroin supply;
By 1999, they were producing 80% of the total market supply;
But then something unexpected happened…; The Taliban rose to power, and by 2000 they had destroyed most of the opium fields. Production dropped from 3,000+tons to only 185 tons, a 94% reduction. ; On Sept. 9th 2001, the full Afghanistan invasion plans were on President Bush`s desk;
Two days later they had their excuse;
Today, opium production in US controlled Afghanistan, which now provides more than 90 percent of the world`s heroin, breaks new production records nearly every year.
How do we stop a system of greed and corruption, that condemns poor populations to sweat shop slavery for the benefit of Madison avenue… or that engineers false flag terror attacks for the sake of manipulation….or that generates built in modes of social operation which are inherently exploitative…
or that systematically reduces civil liberties, and violates human rights in order to protect itself from it own shortcomings.
How do we deal with the numerous covert institutions such as the council on foreign relations, the trilateral commission and the bilderburg group and other undemocratically elected groups ,which , behind closed doors collude to control the political, financial, social and environmental elements of our lives?
In other to find the answer, we must first find the true underlying cause….for the fact is, the selfish, corrupt, power and profit based groups are not the true source of the problem…they are symptoms.
PART 3
[TEXT ON SCREEN:]"GREED AND COMPETITION ARE NOT THE RESULT OF IMMUTABLE HUMAN TEMPERMENT…GREED AND FEAR OF SCARCITY ARE IN FACT BEING CREATED AND AMPLIFIED …THE DIRECT CONSEQUENCE IS THAT WE HAVE TO FIGHT WITH EACH OTHER IN ORDER TO SURVIVE"
-Bernard Lietaer, Founder of the EU Currency System

[FRESCO]
"My name is Jacque fresco. I'm an industrial designer and a social engineer. I am very much interested in society, and developing a system that might be sustainable…for all people.
First of all, the word corruption is a monetary invention…that aberrant behavior...behavior that's disruptive to the well being of people. Well, you're dealing with human behavior, and human behavior appears to be environmentally determined, meaning, if you were raised by the seminal Indians as a baby, never saw anything else, you would hold that value system.
And this goes for nations; it goes for individuals; for families… they try to indoctrinate their children to their particular faith and their country, and make them feel like they're part of that. And they build a society, which they call 'established'. They establish a workable point of view, and tend to perpetuate that. Whereas, all societies are really emergent, not established. And so, they fight new ideas that would interfere with the establishment.
Governments try to perpetuate that which keeps them in power. People are not elected to political office to change things… they are put there to keep things the way they are. So you see, the basis of corruption is in our society. Let me make it clear. All nations then, are basically corrupt, because they tend to uphold existing institutions. I don't mean to uphold or downgrade all nations, but communism, socialism, fascism, the free enterprise system and all other sub-cultures are the same… they are all basically corrupt.

[NARRATION:]
The most fundamental characteristic of our social institutions is the necessity for 'self-preservation'. Whether dealing with a corporation, a religion. or a government, the foremost interest is to preserve the institution itself.
For instance, the last thing an oil company would ever want is the utilization of energy that was outside of its control, for it makes that company less relevant to society. Likewise, the cold war and the collapse of the Soviet Union was, in reality, a way to preserve & perpetuate the established economic and global hegemony of the United States…similarly religions condition people to feel guilty for natural inclinations, each claiming to offer the only path to forgiveness and salvation.
At the heart of this institutional self-preservation lies the monetary system, for it is money that provides the means for power and survival.
Therefore, just as a poor person might be forced to steal in order to survive, it is a natural inclination to do whatever is needed to continue an institution's profitability. This makes it inherently difficult for profit-based institutions to change, for it puts in jeopardy not only the survival of large groups of people, but also the coveted, materialistic lifestyles associated with affluence, and power.
Therefore, the paralyzing necessity to preserve an institution, regardless of its social relevance, is largely rooted in the need for money, or profit.

[TITLE : "INDUSTRY"]
[FRESCO:]
'What's in it for me', is the way people think. And so if a man makes money selling a certain product, naturally he is going to fight the existence of another product that may threaten his institution. Therefore people cannot be fair and people do not trust each other. A guy will come over to you and say, "I've got just the house you're looking for".
He's a salesman. When a doctor says 'I think your kidney has to come out', I don't know if he's trying to pay off a yacht, or that my kidney has to come out- it's hard in monetary system to trust people.
If you came into my store and I said this lamp that I've got is pretty good, but the lamp in the next store is much better, I wouldn't be in business very long. It wouldn't work… If I were ethical, it wouldn't work. So, when you say industry cares for people… that are not true. They can't afford to be ethical. So your system is not designed to serve the well being of people… if you still don't understand that, there would be no outsourcing of jobs… if they cared about people. Industry does not care. They only hire people because it hasn't been automated yet. So, don't talk about decency and ethics… we cannot afford it and remain in business.

[NARRATION:]
It is important to point out, that regardless of the social system, whether fascist, socialist, capitalist or communist, the underlying machanism is still money, labor and competition.
Communist China is no less capitalistic than the United States. The only difference is the degree by which the state intervenes in enterprise.
The reality is that "monetary-ism", so to speak, is the true mechanism that guides the interests of all the countries on the planet.
The most aggressive and hence dominant variation of this monetary-ism is the free enterprise system. The fundamental perspective, as put forth by early free market economists, like Adam smith, is that self-interest and competition leads to social prosperity, as the act of competition creates incentive, which motivates people to persevere.

However, what isn't talked about is how a competition-based economy invariably leads to strategic corruption, power and wealth consolidation, social stratification, technological paralyses, labor abuse, and ultimately a covert form of government dictatorship by the rich elite.
The word corruption is often defined as moral perversion.
If a company dumps toxic waste into the ocean to save money, most people recognize this as corrupt behavior. On a more subtle level, when WalMart moves into a small town and forces small businesses to shut down, for they are unable to complete, a gray area emerges…. For what exactly is Walmart doing wrong? Why should they care about mom and pop organizations they destroy. Yet, even more subtly, when a person gets fired from their job, because a new machine has been created which can do the work for less money, people tend to just accept that as " the way it is" not seeing the inherent, corrupt inhumanity of such an action.
Because the fact is, whether it is dumping toxic waste, having a monopoly enterprise, or downsizing the workforce, the motive is the same.- profit. They are all different degrees of the same self-preserving mechanism, which always puts the well being of people second to monetary gain. Therefore corruption is not some byproduct of monetary-ism… it is the very foundation. And while most people acknowledge this tendency on one level or another, the majority remains naïve as to the broad ramifications of having such a selfish mechanism as the guiding mentality in society.
******
[MSNBC NEWS VIDEO CLIP]
"Internal documents show that after this company positively, absolutely knew that they had a medication that was infected with the Aids virus, they took the product off the market in the U.S. and then they dumped it in France, Europe, Asia and Latin America. The US government allowed it to happen…. The FDA allowed this to happen and now the government is completely looking the other way. Thousands of innocent, hemophiliacs have died from the aids virus. This company knew absolutely that it was infected with Aids. They dumped it because they wanted to turn this disaster into a profit."
[FRESCO]
" So you see, you have built in corruption. We are all chiseling off each other, and you can't expect decency in that sort of thing.
[TITLE: "POLITICS"]
[FRESCO]
And feeling that, they don't know who to elect. They think in terms of a democracy, which is not possible in a monetary based economy.
If you have more money to advertise your position… the position you desire in government, that isn't a democracy. It serves those in positions of differential advantage… so it is always a dictatorship of the elitists- the financially wealthy.

[TEXT ON SCREEN:] "WE CAN EITHER HAVE DEMOCRACY IN THIS COUNTRY OR WE CAN HAVE GREAT WEALTH CONCENTRATED IN THE HANDS OF A FEW, BUT WE CAN'T HAVE BOTH" - Louis Brandeis, supreme court justice
[NARRATION]
It is an interesting observation to note how seemingly unknown personalities, magically appear on the scene as presidential candidates. Then, before you know it, somehow you are left to choose from a small group of extremely wealthy people, who suspiciously have the same broad social view.
Obviously, it's a joke.
The people placed on the ballot are done so because they have been pre-decided to be acceptable by the established financial powers who actually run the show.
Yet, many who understand this illusion of democracy, often think: if only we could just get our honest, ethical politicians in power, then we would be okay. Well, while this idea of course seems reasonable in our established oriented worldview, it is, unfortunately, another fallacy. For, when it really comes down to what is actually important, the institution of politics, and thus politicians themselves have absolutely no true relevance as to what makes our world and society function.
[FRESCO:]
"It's not politicians that can solve problems. They have no technical capabilities. They don't know how to solve problems. Even if they were sincere, they don't know how to solve problems. It's the technicians that produce the desalinization plants. It's the technicians that give you electricity…that give you motor vehicles, that heat your house… and cool it in the summertime. It's technology that solves problems, not politics. Politics cannot solve problems, because they are not trained to do so.
Very few people today stop and consider what it is that actually improves their lives. Is it money? Obviously not… One cannot eat money or stuff money into their car to get it to run… is it politics? - All politicians can do is create laws, establish budgets and declare war. Is it religion? Of course not…. Religion creates nothing except intangible emotional solace for those who require it.
The true gift that we have as human beings have, which has been solely responsible for everything that has improved our lives... is technology.

[TITLE: "TECHNOLGY"]
What is technology? Technology is a pencil, which allows one to solidify ideas on paper for communication. Technology is an automobile, which allows one to travel faster than feet would allow. Technology is a pair of eyeglasses, which enables sight for those who need it.
Applied technology itself is merely an extension of human attributes, which reduces human effort freeing humans from a particular chore or problem. Imagine what your life would be like today without a telephone… or an oven… or a computer… or an airplane. Everything in your home, which you take for granted, from a doorbell to a table to a dishwasher, is technology, generated from the creative, scientific ingenuity of human technicians… not money, politics or religion…These are false institutions.

[FRESCO:]
And writing your congressman is fantastic. They tell you to write your congressman if you want something done. The men in Washington should be at the forefront of technology. The forefront of human study... the forefront of crime… all the factors that shape human behavior. You don't have to write your congressman…. What kind of people are they that are appointed to do that job?
The future will have great difficulty…
And the question that is raised by politicians is " how much will a project cost?" The question is not "how much will it cost?" - "Do we have the resources?" and we have the resources today, to house everyone, build hospitals all over the world, build schools all over the world, the finest equipment in labs for teaching and doing medical research. So you see, we have all that, but we are in a monetary system, and in a monetary system- there's profit.

[NARRATION:]
And what is the fundamental mechanism that drives the profit system, besides self-interest? What is it exactly that maintains that competitive edge at its core. Is it high efficiency and sustainability? No. That isn't part of their design. Nothing produced in our profit-based society is even remotely sustainable or efficient. If it was there wouldn't be a multi-million dollar a year service industry for automobiles, nor would the average life span for most electronics be less than three months before they are obsolete.
Is it abundance? Absolutely not... Abundance, as based on the laws of supply and demand, is actually a negative thing. If a diamond company finds 10 times the usual amount of diamonds during their mining, it means the supply of diamonds has increased, which means the cost and profit per diamond, drops.
The fact is, efficiency, sustainability and abundance are enemies of profit.
To put it into a word., it is the mechanism of SCARCITY that increases profits.

[TITLE" SCARITY]
[FRESCO]
"What is scarcity? Based on keeping products valuable. Slowing up production on oil raises the price. Maintaining scarcity of diamonds, keeps the price high. They burn diamonds at the Kimberly diamond mines- they are made of carbon-it keeps the price up."

[NARRATION:]
So then, what does it means for society when scarcity, either produced naturally or through manipulation, is a beneficial condition for industry?
It means that sustainability and abundance will never ever occur in a profit system, for it simply goes against the very nature of the structure. Therefore, it is impossible to have a world without war or poverty, it is impossible to continually advance technology to its most efficient and productive states … and most dramatically, it is impossible to expect human beings to be behave in truly ethical or decent ways.

[TITLE: "HUMAN NATURE OR HUMAN BEHAVIOR?"]
[FRESCO:]
People use the word instinct. Because they can't account for the behavior. They sit back and they evaluate, with their lack of knowledge, and they say things like: " Humans are built a certain way, greed is natural thing"…as though they worked for years on it… and it's no more natural than wearing clothing.

[MEADOWS:]
What we want to do is to eliminate the causes of the problems. Eliminate the processes that produce greed and bigotry and prejudice and people taking advantage of one another, and elitism. Eliminating the need for prisons and welfare. We have always had these problems because we have always lived within scarcity and barter and monetary systems that produce scarcity.

[FRESCO:]
If you eradicate the conditions that generate what you call socially offensive behavior, it does not exist. A guy says: "well isn't that inborn"? No it's not.

[MEADOWS:]
There is no human nature, there's human behavior, and that's always been changed throughout history. You're not born with bigotry and greed and corruption and hatred. You pick that up within the society.

[FRESCO:]
War, poverty, corruption, hunger, misery, human suffering will not change in a monetary system. That is- there will be very little significant change. It's going to take the redesign of our culture, our values, and it has to be related to the carrying capacity of the earth. Not some human opinion or some politician's notions of the way the world ought to be… or some religious notions of the conduct of human affairs.
And that is what the Venus Project is about.

[TITLE: "THE VENUS PROJECT"]
[FRESCO:]
The society that we're about to talk about is a society that is free of all the old superstitions, incarceration, prisons, police, cruelty and law. All laws will disappear. And the professions will disappear that are no longer valid, such as stockbrokers, bankers, advertising, gone forever. Because it's no longer relevant.

[NARRATION:]
When we understand that is it technology, devised by human ingenuity, which frees humanity and increases our quality of life, we then realize that the most important focus we can have, is on the intelligent management of the earth's resources, for it is from these natural resources we gain the materials to continue our path of prosperity.
Understanding this, we then see that money fundamentally exists as a barrier to these resources for virtually everything has a financial cost. And why do we need money to obtain these resources? Because of real or assumed scarcity. We don't usually pay for air and tap water, because it is in such high abundance, selling it would be pointless.
So then, logically speaking, if resources and technologies applicable to creating everything in our societies, such as houses, cities and transportation, were in high enough abundance, there would be no reason to sell anything. Likewise, if automation and machinery was so technologically advanced, as to relieve human beings of labor, there would be no reason to have a job… and with these social aspects taken care of, there would be no reason to have money at all.
So the ultimate question remains? Do we on earth have enough resources and technological understanding, to create a society of such abundance, that everything we have now could be available without a price tag and without the need for submission through employment?
Yes we do. We have the resources and technology to enable this at a minimum, along with the ability to raise the standard of living so high, that people in the future will look back at our civilization now, and gawk at how primitive and immature our society was.

[FRESCO:]
What the Venus Project proposes is an entirely different system that's updated to present day knowledge.

[MEADOWS:]
We have never given scientists the prob
lem of how do you design a society which would eliminate boring and monotonous jobs, that would eliminate accidents in transportation, that would enable people to have a high standard of living. That would eliminate poisons in our food… give us other sources of energy that are clean and efficient. We can do that out there.

[TITLE: A RESOURCE BASED ECONOMY]
[MEADOWS:]
The major difference, between a resource based economy and a monetary system, is that a resource based economy is really concerned with people and their well-being. Where a monetary system has become so distorted that the concerns of the people are really secondary, if they are there at all. The products that are turned out are for how much money you can get. If there is a problem in society and you can't earn money from solving that problem, than it won't be done. A resource-based economy is really not close to anything that's been tried. And with all our technology today we can create abundance. It can be used to improve everyone's lifestyle…abundance all over the world, if we use our technology wisely and maintain the environment.

[FRESCO:]
It's a very different system and its very hard to talk about because the public is not that well enough informed as to the state of technology.

[TITLE: The Venus Project: ENERGY]
[FRESCO:]
At present, we don't have to burn fossil fuels. We don't have to use anything that would contaminate the environment. There are many sources of energy available.
Narr:
Alternative energy solutions pushed by the establishment, such a hydrogen, biomass and even nuclear, are highly insufficient, dangerous, and exist only to perpetuate the profit structure that industry has created. When we look beyond the propaganda and self-serving solutions put forth by the energy companies, we find a seemingly endless stream of clean, abundant and renewable energy for generating power.
Solar and wind energy are well known the public, but the true potential of these mediums remains unexpressed. Solar energy, derived from the sun, has such abundance, that one hour of light at high noon, contains more energy than what the entire world consumes in a year. If we could capture .01 of a percent of this energy, the world would never have to use oil, gas or anything else. The question then is not availability, but the technology to harness it, and there are many advanced mediums today, which could accomplish just that, if they were not hindered by the need to compete for market share with the established energy power structures.
Then there is wind energy. Wind energy has long been denounced as weak and, due to it being location driven, impractical. This is simply not true. The US department of energy admitted in 2007, that if wind was fully harvested in just 3 of America's 50 states, it could power the entire nation.
And then there are the rather unknown mediums of Tidal and Wave Power. Tidal power is derived from Tidal shifts in the ocean. Installing turbines, which capture this movement, generates energy. In the United Kingdom, 42 sites are currently noted as available, forecasting that 34% of all the UK's energy could come form tidal power alone. Wave Power, which extracts energy from the surface motions of the ocean, is estimated to have a global potential of up to 80,000 TWh a year, This means 50% of the entire planet's energy usage could be produced from this medium alone.
Now It is important to point out that tidal, wave, solar and wind power requires virtually no preliminary energy to harness, unlike coal, oil, gas, biomass, hydrogen and all the others.
In combination, these four mediums alone, if efficiently harnessed through technology, could power the world forever.
That being said, there happens to be another form of clean, renewable energy, which trumps them all- Geothermal Power.
Geothermal energy utilizes what is called heat mining, which, though a simple process using water, is able to generate massive amounts of clean energy. In 2006, an MIT report on geothermal energy found that 13,000 zettajoules of power are currently available in the earth, with the possibility of 2000 zj being easily tap-able with improved technology. The total energy consumption of all the countries on the planet is about half of a zettajoule a year. This means about 4000 years of planetary power could be harnessed in this medium alone. And when we understand that the earth's heat generation is constantly renewed, this energy is really limitless and could be used forever.
These energy sources are only a few of the clean, renewable mediums available, and as time goes on, we will find more.
The grand realization is that we have total energy abundance, without the need for pollution, traditional conservation, or, in fact, a price tag.

[TITLE: THE VENUS PROJECT - TRANSPORATION]
And what about transportation? The prevailing means of transportation in our societies is by automobile and aircraft, both of which predominantly need fossils fuels to run.
In the case of the automobile, the battery technology needed to power an electric car that can go over 100 miles an hour for over 200 miles on one charge exists, and has existed for many years. However, due to battery patents controlled by the oil industry, which limits their availability, to maintain market share, coupled with the political pressure from the energy industry, the accessibility and affordability of this technology is limited.
There is absolutely no reason, other than pure, corrupt profit interest, that every single vehicle in the world could not be electric and utterly clean, with zero need for gasoline.
As far as airplanes, it is time we realize that this means of travel is inefficient, cumbersome, slow, and causes far too much pollution.
This is a Mag Lev train. It uses magnets for propulsion. It is fully suspended by a magnetic field, and requires less than 2% of the energy used for plane travel. The train has no wheels, so nothing can wear out. The current maximum speed of versions of this technology, as used in Japan, is 361 miles per hour. However, this version of the technology is very dated.
An organization called ET3, which has connections with the Venus Project, has established a tube based maglev that can travel up to 4000 miles per hour, in a motionless, frictionless tube, which can go over land, or underwater. Imagine going from LA to NY for an extended lunch break…. Or from Washington DC to Beijing China in 2 hours. This is the future of continental and intercontinental travel. Fast, clean, with only a fraction of the energy usage we use today for the same means.
In fact, between maglev technology, advanced battery storage, and geothermal energy, there would be no reason to ever burn fossil fuels again. And we can do this now, if we were not held back by the paralyzing profit structure.

[TITLE: "WORK"]
[FRESCO:]
Now America is inclined towards fascism. It has a propensity by its dominant philosophy and religion, to uphold the fascist point of view. American industry is essentially a fascist institution. If you don't understand that, the minute you punch that time clock, you walk into a dictatorship.

[MEADOWS:]
Were given notions about the respectability of work. And I really look at as being paid slavery.

[FRESCO]:
You're brought up to believe that you shall earn you living by the sweat of your brow… that holds people back. Freeing people, from drudgery, repetitive jobs, which make them ignorant. You rob them. In our society, that is a resource-based economy, machines free people. You see, we can't image that, because we've never known that kind of world.
[TITLE: AUTOMATION]
[NARRRATION:]
If we look back history, we see a very clear pattern of machine automation, slowly replacing human labor. From the disappearance of the elevator man, to the near full automation of an automobile production plant, the fact is as technology grows, the need for humans in the work force will continually be diminished. This creates a serious clash, which proves the falseness of the monetary based labor system… for human employment is in direct competition with technological development. Therefore, given the fundamental priority of profit by Industry, people, through time will be continually laid off and replaced by machine.

[FRESCO:]
When industry takes on a machine, instead of shortening the workday, they downsize, you lose you job, so you have a right to fear machines.

[NARRATION:]
In a high technology, resourced based economy, it is conservative to say that about 90% of all current occupations could be phased out by machines… Freeing humans to live their life without servitude… for this is the point of technology itself. And through time, with nanotechnology and other highly advances forms of science, it isn't far fetched to see how even complex medical procedures could be performed by machines as well. And, based on the pattern, with much higher success rates than humans get today.
The path is clear… but our monetary based structure, which requires labor for income, blocks this progress, for humans need jobs in order to survive. The bottom line is that this system must go, or we will never be free and technology will be constantly paralyzed.

[FRESCO:]
When you have machines that clean out sewers, it frees a human being from doing that. So look at machines as extensions of human performance.

NARRATION:
Furthermore, many occupations today will have simply no basis to exist in a resourced based economy…such as anything associated the management of money, advertising, along with the legal system itself. For, without money, a great majority of the crimes that are committed today would never occur. Virtually all forms are of Crime are a consequence of the monetary system either directly, or by neurosis inflicted though financial deprivation. Therefore laws themselves could eventually become extinct.

[FRESCO:]
Instead of putting up a sign: 'drive carefully, slippery when wet, put abrasive in the highway, so it's not slippery when wet. If a person gets in a car and they're drunk and the car oscillates a great deal, there's a little pendulum that swings up and back, and that will pull the car over to the side… not a law, a solution. Put sonar and radar in automobiles, so they cant hit one another. Man-made laws are attempts to deal with occurring problems, and not knowing how to solve them, they make a law.

[NARRATION:]
In the United States, the most privitazed, capitalist country on the planet, it should come as no surprise that it also has the largest prison population in the world…growing every year. Statistically, most of these people are uneducated and come from poor, deprived societies. And contrary to propaganda, it's this environmental conditioning which lures them into criminal and violent behavior. However, society looks the other way in regard to this point.
The legal and prison systems are just more examples of how our society avoids examining the root causes of behavior. Billions are spent each year on prisons and police, while only a fraction is spent on programs for poverty, which is one of the most fundamental variables responsible for crime to begin with.
And, as long as we have an economic system, which prefers and in fact creates scarcity deprivation, crime will never go away.

[FRESCO:]
If people have access to the necessities of life, without servitude, debt, barter, trade… they behave very differently. You want all these things available without a price tag. Now then, 'you gotta have a price tag, what will motivate people… if man gets everything he wants he will just lay around in the sun'. This is the myth they perpetuate. People in our culture are trained to believe that the monetary system produces incentive, if they have access to things, why should they want to do anything. They will lose their incentive. That's what you're taught to support the monetary system,

[MEADOWS:]
When you take money out of the scenario, there would be different incentives, very different incentives.

[FRESCO:] When people have access to the necessities of life, their incentives change…what about the moon and the stars. New incentives arise... if you make a painting that you enjoy. You will enjoy giving it to other people, not selling it.

[TITLE EDUCATION.:]
[MEADOWS:'
I think most of the education that I've seen today is essentially producing a person for a job… it is very specialized. They are not generalists… people don't know a lot about a lot different subjects. I don't think you could get people to go to war if they knew a lot about a lot of things. I think education is mostly rote and they're not taught how to solve problems… they are not given the tools, emotionally or within their own field, of how to do critical thinking. In a resource based economy the education would be very different.

[FRESCO:]
Our societies major concern is mental development… and to motivate each person to their highest potential. Because our philosophy is, the smarter people are the richer the world, because everybody becomes a contributor.

[MEADOWS:]
The smarter your kids are, the better my life will be, because they will be contributing more constructively to the environment and to my life, because everything that we devise within a resource based economy, would be applied to society. There would be nothing to hold it back.

TITLE: Civilization
[FRESCO:]
Patriotism, weapons, armies, navy…. All that is a sign, that we are not civilized yet. Kids will ask their parents ' didn't you see the necessity of the machines? Dad, couldn't you see that war was inevitable when you produce scarcity? Isn't it obvious? Of course, the kid will understand, that you were pinheads… raised merely to serve the established institutions. We're such an abominable, sick society, that we wont make the history books, they will just say that large nations took land from smaller nations, used force and violence. You will get history talked about as corrupt behavior all the way along, until the beginning of the civilized world… that's when all the nations worked together. World unification… working toward for common good for all human beings, and without anyone being subservient to anyone else. Without social stratification… whether it is technical elitism, or any other kind of elitism, eradicated from the face of the earth.
The state does nothing, because there is no state.
The system I advocate, a resource based global economy, is not perfect, it just a lot better than what we have. We can never achieve perfection.

PART 4
TEXT ON SCREEN: "MY COUNTRY IS THE WORLD… AND MY RELIGION IS TO DO GOOD" -THOMAS PAINE (1737-1809)"

[NARRATION:]
The social values of our society, which has manifested in perpetual warfare, corruption, oppressive laws, social stratification, irrelevant superstitions, environmental destruction, and a despotic, socially different, profit oriented, ruling class, is fundamentally the result of a collective ignorance, of two of the most basic insights humans can have about reality... the EMERGENT and SYBIOTIC aspects of natural law.
The Emergent nature of reality, is that all systems, whether it is knowledge, society, technology, philosophy, or any other creation, will, when uninhibited, undergo fluid, perpetual change. What we consider commonplace today, such modern communication and transportation, would have been unimaginable in ancient times… likewise, the future will contain technologies, realizations and social structures, that we cannot even fathom in the present. We have gone from Alchemy, to chemistry…from a geocentric universe, to a heliocentric…from believing that demons where the cause of illness, to modern medicine. This development shows no sign of ending, and it is this awareness that aligns us and leads us on a continuous path to growth and progress. Static, Empirical knowledge does not exist…rather it is the insight of the emergence of all systems, we must recognize. This means we must be open to new information at all times, even if it threatens our current belief system and hence, identities.
Sadly, society today has failed to recognize this and the established institutions continue to paralyze growth, by preserving outdated social structures. Simultaneously, the population suffers from a fear of change as well, for their conditioning assumes a static identity, and challenging ones belief system, usually results in insult and apprehension, for being wrong is erroneously associated with failure.
When, if fact, to be proven wrong should be a celebrated, for it is elevating someone to a new level of understanding, furthering awareness. The fact is, there is no such thing as a smart human being, for it is merely a matter of time, before their ideas are updated, changed or eradicated. And this tendency to blindly hold on to a belief system, sheltering it from new, possibly transforming information, is nothing less than a form of "intellectual materialism".
The monetary system perpetuates this materialism not only by its self preserving structures, but also through the countless number of people who have been conditioned into blindly, and thoughtlessly upholding these structures, therefore becoming 'self-appointed guardians of the status quo". Sheep, which no longer need a sheep dog to control them, for they control each other by ostracizing those who step out of the norm.
This tendency to resist change and uphold existing institutions for the sake of identity, comfort, power and profit, is completely unsustainable and will only produce further imbalance, fragmentation, distortion and invariably, destruction. It's time to change.
From hunters and gathers, to the agricultural revolution, to the industrial revolution, the pattern is clear. It is time for a new social system, which reflects the understandings we have today.
The monetary system is a product of a period of time where scarcity was a reality. Now, with the age of technology, it is no longer relevant to society; gone with the aberrant behavior it manifests.
Likewise, dominant worldviews, such a theistic religion, operate with the same social irrelevancy. Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, and all of the others, exist as barriers to personal and social growth, for each group perpetuates a closed worldview…and this finite understanding that they acknowledge is simply not possible in an emergent universe.
Yet, religion has succeeded in shutting down the awareness of this emergence by instilling the psychological distortion of Faith upon its followers, where logic and new information is rejected, in favor of traditionalized, outdated beliefs.

[FRESCO:]
The concept of god is really a method of accounting for the nature of things. In the early days people didn't know enough about how things formed… how nature worked…so they invented their own little stories… and they made god in their own image… a guy that gets angry; when people don't behave right, he creates floods and earthquakes… and they say it is an act of god.
A cursory glance at the suppressed history of religion reveals that even the foundational myths themselves are emergent culminations, developed through influence, over time.
For example, a cardinal doctrine of the Christian faith is the death and resurrection of Christ. This notion is so important, that the Bible itself states: "And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain"(1 Cor 15:14).
Yet, it is very difficult to take this account literally for, not only is there no primary source denoting this supernatural event in secular history, awareness of the enormous number of pre-Christian saviors who also died and were resurrected, immediately puts the story in mythological territory by association.
Early Church figures, such as Tertullian, went to great lengths to break these associations; even claiming that the devil caused the similarities to occur… stating in 2nd century:
"The devil, whose business is to pervert the truth, mimics the exact circumstance of the Divine Sacraments. He baptizes his believers and promises forgiveness of sins…he celebrates the oblation of bread, and brings in the symbol of the resurrection. Let us therefore acknowledge the craftiness of the devil, who copied certain things of those that be Divine." Tertullian, (155 - 222 AD , CHAP. XL.- THE PRESCRIPTION AGAINST HERETICS. )
What is truly sad however, is that when we cease the idea that the stories from Christianity, Judaism and Islam, and all the others, are Literal History, and accept them for what they really are, which are purely allegorical expressions, derived from many faiths…we see that all religions share a common thread, and it is this unifying imperative that needs to be recognized and appreciated.
Religious belief has caused more fragmentation and conflict than any other ideology…Christianity alone has 34,000 different sub groups( Source: World Christian Encyclopedia)

[FRESCO:]
The bible is subject to interpretation. When you read it you say: ' I think Jesus meant this... I think jobe meant that… oh no- he meant this'… So you have the Lutheran the Seventh-
Day-Adventist; the catholic. And a church divided, is no church at all.
(echo " and a church divided is no church at all)
And this point on division, which is a trademark of all theistic religions, brings us to our second failure of awareness. The false assumption of separation, through the rejection of the symbiotic relationship of life.
Apart from the understanding that all natural systems are emergent, where all notions of reality will be constantly developed, altered and even eradicated, we must also understand that all systems are, in fact, invented fragments, merely for the sake of conversation, for there is no such thing as independence in nature. The whole of nature is a unified system of interdependent variables, each a cause and a reaction, existing only as concentrated whole.

[FRESCO:]
You don't see the plug connected to the environment, so it looks like we're free, wondering around. Take the oxygen away, we all die immediately; take planet life away, we die, and without the sun, all the plants die. So we are connected.

[PERKINS:]
We really must take into account, the totality. This isn't just a human experience on this planet, this is a total experience and we know we cant survive without planet and animals; we know we can't survive without the four elements, you know. And so, when are we really going to start taking that into account. That's what it is to be successful. Success depends on how well we relate to everything around us. I am very aware of the fact that my grandson cannot possibly hope to inherit a sustainable, peaceful, stable, socially just world, unless every child today growing up in Ethiopia; in Indonesia, in Bolivia; in Palestine and Israel… as has that same expectations. You gotta take care of the whole community, or you are going to have serious problems. And now we have to see that the whole world is the community. And we must all take care of each other that way, and it's not just a community of humans beings… it is a community of plant and animals and elements, and we really need to understand that. That's what is going to bring us joy too… and pleasure. That's what's missing our lives right now. We can call it spirituality… but the fact of the matter is, joy comes from that…bliss of connectness.
That's our God spirit… that's that side of ourselves that really feels it… you can feel it deep inside you… it is this amazing wonderful feeling and you know it when you get it. You don't get it from money. You get it from connection.

[BILL HICKS SAMPLE]
Now if that isn't a Hazard to this country. How are we gonna keep building nuclear weapons, you know what I mean! What going to happen to the arms industry, when we realize we are all one?! It's gonna fuck up the economy! The economy that's fake anyway! ( echo x 4)
Which would be a real bummer… you can see why the government is cracking down, on the idea of experiencing unconditional love.

TEXT: " I BELIEVE THAT UNARMED TRUTH AND UNCONDITIONAL LOVE WILL HAVE THE FINAL WORD IN REALITY" - Martin Luther King Jr.
[NARRATION:]
Once we understand that the integrity of our personal existences are completely dependent on the integrity of everything else in our world… we have truly understood the meaning of unconditional love. For love is extensionality…and seeing everything as you and you as everything, can have no conditionalities…. For, in fact, we are all everything at once.

[George Carlin]
If it's true that we are all from the center of a star, every atom in each of us from the center of a star, then we're all the same thing. Even a coke machine or a cigarette butt in the street in Buffalo, is made out of atoms that came from a star… they have all recycled thousands of times, as have you and I. And therefore, its only me out there, so what is there to be afraid of? What is there that needs solace seeking? Nothing. There is nothing to be afraid of because it's all us. The trouble is we have been separated by being born and given a name and an identity and being individuated. We have been separated from the oneness and that's what religion exploits… that people have this yearning to be part of the overall one again. So they exploit that. They it god and they say he has rules… and I think that's cruel. I think you can do it absent religion.

[TEXT ON SCREEN: CARL SAGAN QUOTE:]
An extraterrestrial visitor examining the difference among human societies would find those differences trivial compared to the similarities. Our lives, our past and our future are tied to the sun, the moon and the stars…We humans have seen the atoms which constitute all of nature and the forces that sculpted this work…and we, who embody the local eyes and ears and thoughts and feelings of the cosmos, have begun to wonder about our origins…star stuff contemplating the stars, organized collections of ten billion billion billion atoms, contemplating the evolution of nature, tracing that long path by which it arrived at consciousness here on the planet earth…Our loyalties are to the species and the to the planet. Our obligation to survive and flourish is owed now just to ourselves but also to that cosmos ancient and vast from which we spring. We are on Species. We are start stuff harvesting starlight.
It is time to claim the unity, our outmoded social systems have broken apart …. And work together to create a sustainable global society, where everyone is taken care of and everyone is truly free.
Your personal beliefs, whatever they may be, are meaningless when it comes to the necessities of life. Every human being is born naked, needing warmth, food, water, shelter... Everything else is auxiliary. Therefore, the most important issue at hand is the intelligent management of the earth resources. This can never be accomplished in a monetary system, for the pursuit of profit, is the pursuit of self-interest and therefore imbalance is inherent. Simultaneously, politicians are useless, for our true problems in life are technical, not political. Furthermore ideologies that separate humanity, such as religion, need strong reflection in the community in regard to its value, purpose and social relevancy. Hopefully, through time, religion will lose its materialism and basis in superstition, and move into the useful field, of philosophy.
The fact is, society today is backwards, with politicians constantly talking about protection and security, rather than creation, unity and progress.
The US alone now spends about 500 Billion dollars annually on defense… that is enough to send every high school senior in America to a 4 yr collage.
In the 1940s, the Manhattan Project produced the first true weapon of mass destruction. This program employed 130,000 people at an extreme financial cost.
Image what our life would be like today, if that group of scientists instead of working on a way of killing people, worked on a way to create a self sustaining, abundant world. Life today, would be very very different, if that was their goal.
Instead of weapons of mass destruction…It is time to unleash something much more powerful… Weapons of Mass Creation. Our true divinity is our ability to create, and armed with the understanding of the Symbiotic connections of life, while being guided by the emergent nature of reality, there is nothing we cannot do or accomplish.
Of course, we face strong barriers, in the form of established power structures that refuse to change.
At the heart of these structures is the monetary system. As explained earlier, the fractional reserve policy is a form of slavery through debt, where it is literally impossible for society to be free. In turn, free market capitalism in the form of free trade, uses debt to imprison the world and manipulate countries into subservience to a handful of large business and political powers. Apart form these obvious amoralities; the system itself is based on competition, which immediately destroys the possibility of large-scale collaborations for the common good, hence paralyzing any attempt at true global sustainability.
These financial and corporate structures are now obsolete and they must be outgrown.
Of course, we cannot be naïve enough to think that the business and financial elite are going to subscribe to this idea, for they will lose power and control. Therefore, peaceful. Yet highly strategic action must be taken. The most powerful course of action is simple. We have to alter our behavior to force the power structure to the will of the people.
We must stop supporting the system.
The only way the establishment will change, is by our refusal to participate,
…while continuously acknowledging it endless flaws and corruptions.

[FRESCO:]
They're not going to give up the monetary system because of our designs and what we recommend. The system has to fail, and people have to lose confidence in their elected leaders. That will be a major turning point, if the Venus project is offered as a possible alternative. If not, I fear the consequences. The trends now indicate that our country is going bankrupt. The probability is, our country will move toward a military dictatorship, to prevent riots and complete social break down. Once the US breaks down, all the other cultures will under go similar things.
As of now, the world financial system is on the brink of collapse, due to its own shortcomings. The comptroller of currency stated in 2003 that the interest on the US national debt will not be affordable in less than 10 years. This theoretically means total bankruptcy for the US economy. And it's implications for the world, are immense.
In turn, the fractional reserve based monetary system is reaching its theoretical limits of expansion and the banking failures you are seeing are just the beginning. This is why inflation is skyrocketing, all debt is at record levels and the government and fed are hemorrhaging new money to bail out the corrupt system. For, the only way to keep the banks going is by making more money… the only way to make more money is to create more debt and inflation. It is simply a matter of time before the tables turn and there is no one willing to take new loans, while defaults grow, as people are unable to afford their current loans. Then the expansion of money will stop and contraction will begin on a scale never before seen, ending a century long, pyramid scheme. This has already begun.

Therefore, we need to expose this financial failure for what it is, using this weakness
to our advantage.
Here are some suggestions:
1) Expose the Banking Fraud. Citibank, and JP Morgan Chase and Bank of America are the most powerful controllers within the Corrupt Federal Reserve System. Its time to boycott these institutions. If you have a bank account or a credit card with any of them, move your money to another bank. If you have a mortgage, refinance with another bank. If you own their stock, sell it. If you work for them, quit. This gesture will express contempt for true power behind the private banking cartel, known as the Federal Reserve. And create awareness about the fraud of the banking system itself.
2) Turn off the TV News. Visit the emerging, independent news agencies on Internet for your information. CNN, NBC, ABC, FOX and all the others, present all news, pre-filtered to maintain the status quo.
With 4 corporations owning all major media outlets, objective information is impossible. This is the true beauty of the Internet and the establishment has been losing control because of this free flow of information. We must protect the Internet at all times, as it is truly our savior right now
3) Don't ever allow yourself, your family, or anyone you know… to ever join, the military. This is an obsolete institution, now used exclusively for maintaining an establishment that is not longer relevant. US soldiers in Iraq, work for US corporations, not the people. Propaganda forces us to believe that war is natural, and the military is an honorable institution. Well, if war is natural, why are there 18 suicides every single day by America veterans, who have post-traumatic stress disorder? If our military men and woman are so honored, why it is that 25% of the American homeless population are veterans.
4) Stop supporting the energy companies. If you live in a detached house, get off the grid. Investigate every means of making your home self-sustainable with clean energy. Solar, wind and other renewable energies are now affordable, consumer realities and considering the never-ending, raising cost of traditional energies, it likely will be a cheaper investment over time. If you drive, get the smallest car you can, and consider using one of the many conversion technologies that can enable your car to be a hybrid, electric or run on anything other than Establishment fuels.
5) Reject the Political system. The illusion of democracy is an insult to our intelligence. In a monetary system there is no such thing as a true democracy… and there never was. We have 2 political parties owned by the same set of corporate lobbyists.
They are placed in their positions by the corporations, with popularity, artificially projected by their media. In a system of inherent corruption, the change of personal every couple of years has very little relevance. Instead of pretending the political game has any true meaning, focus your energies on how to transcend this failed system.
6) Join the movement, Go thezeitgeistmovement.com and help us create the largest mass movement for social change, the world has ever seen. We must mobilize and educate everyone about the inherent corruption of our current world system, along with the only true, sustainable solution- declaring all the natural resources on the planet as common heritage to all people, while informing everyone as to the true state of technology and how we can all be free if the world works together, rather than fights.
The choice lies with you. You can continue being a slave to the financial system, and watch the continuous wars, depressions and injustice across the globe, while placating yourself with vain entertainment and materialistic garbage…
Or you can focus your energy on true meaningful, lasting holistic change, which actually has the realistic ability to support and free all humans, with no one left behind.
But, in the end, the most relevant change must occur first inside of you. The real revolution is the Revolution of Consciousness and each one of us first needs to eliminate the divisionary, materialistic noise, we have been conditioned to think is true…while discovering, amplifying and aligning with the signal coming from our true, empirical oneness. It's up to you.
[J. Krishnamurti]
"What we are try [to do ]… in all these discussions and talks here is to see if we cannot radically bring about a transformation of the mind. No accept thing as they are! But to understand it, to go into it, to examine it… to give your heart and your mind with everything you have to find out… a way of living differently. But that depend on you and not somebody else. Because in this there is no teacher; no pupil…there is no leader.
There is no guru. There is no master, no savior...You yourself are the teacher and the pupil; you are the master, you are the guru, you are the leader. You are everything!
And… to understand is to transform what is.

Você acredita no fim do mundo?

2009-07-22T15:23:00.001-03:00

Então veja o que outros pensam, desde os Maias.

Profissões Liberais

2009-05-25T12:38:00.003-03:00

O exercício de uma Profissão Liberal depende de formação específica, disto não temos a menor dúvida.
Mas a existência de um Conselho Federal Profissional para fiscalizar o exercício de uma atividade profissional liberal é uma intervenção do Estado que prejudica a segurança pública e impede o livre funcionamento do Mercado.
Propõe-se a criação de uma Consolidação das Leis das Profissões Liberais - CLPL, em um único texto, com a adoção do sistema de contrôle hoje adotado pelo CONFEA, com as devidas alterações.

Para discutir o assunto e iniciar a elaboração do texto da proposta, sugere-se a criação de um Servidor de Documentos na Internet, onde o texto poderá ser escrito de forma colaborativa.

Conselhos Federais Profissionais

2009-04-08T15:36:00.006-03:00

Um dos maiores ataques à liberdade de expressão é a existência dos Conselhos Federais Profissionais.

Minha idéia de regulamentação profissional passa pela Receita Federal, que deverá efetuar a cobrança das taxas e impostos incidentes sôbre o exercício das Profissões Liberais, pelas Delegacias Regionais do Trabalho, que deverão fazer os registros e emitir as Certidões de Acêrvo Técnico referentes aos trabalhos realizados pelos Profissionais Liberais e pelo Ministério Público, que deverá efetuar a fiscalização do exercícios das Profissões Liberais, em Câmara do MP a ser criada para tal função.

Quanto aos CFP existentes, sugiro a extinção, fechamento, passagem dos próprios para o Estado e demissão de todos os funcionários.

Profissional Liberal: uma Pessoa Liberal.

2009-04-04T19:08:00.011-03:00

Regulamentação ou Conselho Federal Profissional?
O Projeto da SBC, de regulamentação das profissões de informática, diz: "O requisito fundamental para regulamentar este mandamento constitucional para profissões específicas apóia-se na possibilidade de o exercício de uma determinada profissão poder causar sério dano social, principalmente relativo à exposição de vidas humanas a riscos."
As profissões das TI PODEM causar sérios danos às pessoas: você dirige um carro que “fala” com você?
E se o programa entrar em curto por existir um campo magnético muito forte, um disco rígido bater uma cabeça de leitura numa trilha de programa, o que você pensa que vai acontecer?
Não existe um sistema de contrôle de qualidade para programas de computador no mesmo nível praticado pela inústria automobilística, por exemplo, em que os componentes de um veículo são extensivamente testados antes de serem introduzidos em um veículo e pôsto à venda ao público.
E se o programa que controla a dosagem de componentes em drogas medicinais falhasse, o que você pensa que aconteceria?
A produção de programas de computador É tão séria quando a construção civil ou a Medicina.
Você já leu o Têrmo de Licença de Programa de Computador da empresa das janelinhas? Você não TEM DIREITO NENHUM, só tem OBRIGAÇÕES e não pode reinvindicar nada. E você NÃO TEM GARANTIA NENHUMA E SEGURANÇA NENHUMA, tudo fica por sua conta e risco. Isto ocorre por decorrência da natureza física (magnética) do meio utilizado para o transporte e uso final do programa de computador.
Você gostaria de estar em um avião quando o comandante avisasse que o sistema travou e o avião TERIA de cair para reinicializar o sistema?
Pergunte à Marinha dos EUA o que acontece quando as janelinhas travam e os navios ficam à mercê de atacantes, que por sorte, nunca estão por perto quando o navio fica completamente morto por divisão por zero, por exemplo.
Pergunte a uma empresa de seguros se êles concordam em SEGURAR o sistema que você usa.
Novamente citando o projeto da SBC:
“Nestes casos, para a devida defesa da Sociedade, impõe-se o cumprimento de cursos específicos, obtenção de diplomas de cursos superiores e submissão dos profissionais às regras de órgãos fiscalizadores."
É aqui que a tendência corporativista da elite acadêmica e comercial brasileiras entra em cena.
A maioria pensa em ESTADO quando uma RESPONSABILIDADE deve ser assumida.
Todos concordam em assinar a Declaração Universal dos Direitos do Homem e a maioria foge, como o diabo foge da cruz, de assinar uma Declaração Universal das Responsabilidades Humanas.
E isto é o que todos temos, para conosco, com nossos semelhantes e TÔDA a forma de vida da Terra.
Realmente, somente a qualidade da formação escolar ou acadêmica poderá oferecer uma “garantia” da qualidade do trabalho de um profissional liberal formado em TI.
Agora sim, a experiência britânica poderá ser útil em estabelecer, aqui, um conjunto de idéias de institucionalização das Profissões de TI, auto-regulando a ação dos profissionais.
As idéias Inglêsas de TI como uma profissão focada em negócios e com objetivo de maximizar a exploração das tecnologias de informação pode ser uma chamada à realidade para nós.
Não que seja da SBC esta obrigação, pois a SBC pode ser uma organização com um objetivo e existirem outras organizações com tais objetivos. Lembremo-nos, sempre, de perguntar-nos o que cada um de nós pode fazer pelas profissões de Tecnoogias de Informação, antes de perguntar o que a SBC pode fazer por nós.
É nossa responsabilidade criar as organizações civis profissionais, tal como uma .org.br para Análise, outra para banco de dados, de acôrdo com as identidades e preferências dos profissionais.
Há muitos anos que clamo no deserto pelo fim dos Conselhos Federais Profissionais e que o Ministério Público deve assumir TÔDAS as funções FISCALIZADORAS da Profissões Liberais, a Receita Federal deve assumir a cobrança das taxas e impostos relativos ao exercício das Profissões Liberais e o Ministério do Trabalho, por meio das Delegacias Regionais do Trabalho devem assumir a responsabilidade de fazer e certificar os registros do exercício das Profissões Liberais.
Um Profissional Liberal é como uma Pessoa Física ou uma Pessoa Jurídica: é uma Pessoa Liberal. Os impostos para os Profissionais Liberais deveriam ser diferenciados, pois a capacidade de criar emprêgos é diferenciada.
Não deveria haver a exigência de uma CNPJ ou sede física para o exercício de uma Profissão Liberal, pois, geralmente, quando um PL é contratado, pode exercer sua atividade tanto nas dependências do cliente quanto em suas próprias.
A Lei deveria PROIBIR a contratação de um Profissional Liberal como EMPREGADO, pois o exercício de uma atividade liberal é completamente incompatível com a dependência e a submissão a um patrão: um PL (uma Pessoa Liberal) não tem patrão.
Na matemática isto equivaleria à uma inconsistência dimensional.
Novamente recorrendo ao texto da proposta da SBC, cita-se: "como ocorre na Informática, recomenda-se, em nome do interesse social, da eficiência e da qualidade de bens e serviços oferecidos à população, a prevalência da liberdade sobre o anti-democrático cerceamento do direito ao exercício profissional, tradicionalmente imposto por conselhos de profissão."
Também concordamos com isto. Não há provas de haver democracia com um Conselho Federal Profissional e que NÃO HAVER DEMOCRACIA sem o Conselho Federal Profissional.

O Metrô é o modal adequado para Brasília?

2008-10-08T17:34:00.000-03:00

Não seria o caso de se repensar os modais de transportes de Brasília, e por extensão das cidades "satélites" (as Regiões Administrativas)?

Uso do solo e Planejamento estratégico da localização das fontes de renda

Seria o caso de se promoverem estudos de uso e ocupação do solo e geração de fontes de renda nas diversas RRAA, pois é a renda que está fora das RRAA, por isto a necessidade de modais cada vez mais capazes (em termos de volume de tráfego) para transportar as pessoas que DEVEM se deslocar à procura de renda.

Pode-se pensasr em centros de gravidade dos sítios de consumo e geração de renda e assim definir o traçado mais adequado para a localização das linhas diretrizes dos eixos de transportes.

Definindo as rotas a partir dos centros de gravidade de geração de renda e consumo, desloca-se o problema do ponto de vista do transporte das pessoas de casa para o trabalho, para o ponto de vista do centro gerador de renda para o centro de consumo.

E há que se distinguir os centros de consumo e de residência, pois nas áreas residenciais têm-se centros de consumo permanentes, enquanto nas áreas comerciais tem-se centro de consumo sazonais,e com população não-cativa, isto é, as pessoas que vão aí consumir vêm de várias origens, isto é, nos centros comerciais, consume-se de acordo com a "safra" da renda (o salário), enquanto nas áreas residenciais consume-se TODOS os dias, o consumo de subsistência, até alcançar o valor do salário. Um olhar de estratégia para o futuro no uso e ocupação do solo e também na localização estratégica de novos focos geradores de renda.

Código Aberto e Produção de Renda

2008-10-03T19:25:00.003-03:00

A Abertura do Código

Você pode ir a uma página da internet, baixar um programa de razoável complexidade e utilizá-lo, livremente, e auferir renda.
O uso de programas de código aberto determina um novo paradima na sociedade capitalista, agora de consumo de informação. Agora, vamos consumir conhecimento, como se fosse lanche e refrigerantes em lojas de "fast food". Você entra em uma "Lan House" e acessa o seu menu de informações do dia. Você pode ensinar êstes procedimentos a outros usuários, até mesmo, ensinar como usar os programas que você usa, sem se preocupar com os custos: é tudo gratuito.